The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of early intervention on 5-year outcome in non-affective psychosis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Early specialised care may improve short-term outcome in first-episode non-affective psychosis, but it is unclear if these benefits endure. Aims: To assess the long-term effect of early intervention in psychosis. Method: Individuals with first-episode psychosis were randomised to specialised care or care as usual (trial number: ISRCTN73679874). Outcome after 5 years was assessed by case-note review. Results: There were no significant differences in the admission rate (coefficient 0.096, 95% CI −0.550 to 0.742, P = 0.770) or the mean number of bed days (coefficient 6.344, 95% CI −46 to 58.7, P = 0.810). Conclusions: These findings that specialist intervention did not markedly improved outcome at 5 years accord with those from a larger OPUS study. The sample size of this study was small and these results should be generalised with caution. More research is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early intervention for psychosis
Marshall, M., & Rathbone, J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004718.pub3 · Cited by 531
Implementing Early Intervention in Psychosis: A Guide to Establishing Psychosis Services
Edwards, J., & McGorry, P. D. (2002) · doi:10.1201/b14315 · Cited by 226
Cognitively oriented psychotherapy for early psychosis (COPE): A 1‐year follow‐up
Jackson, H., McGorry, P., Henry, L., Edwards, J., Hulbert, C., Harrigan, S., Dudgeon, P., Francey, S., Maude, D., Cocks, J., et al. (2001) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466501163481 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Cited by
Correll, C. U., Galling, B., Pawar, A., Krivko, A., Bonetto, C., Ruggeri, M., Craig, T. J., Nordentoft, M., Srihari, V. H., Guloksuz, S., et al. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623 · Cited by 826
Self-citationPenttilä, M., Jääskeläinen, E., Hirvonen, N., Isohanni, M., & Miettunen, J. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127753 · Cited by 716
Reappraising the long-term course and outcome of psychotic disorders: the AESOP-10 study
Morgan, C., Lappin, J., Heslin, M., Donoghue, K., Lomas, B., Reininghaus, U., Onyejiaka, A., Croudace, T., Jones, P. B., Murray, R. M., et al. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000282 · Cited by 248
On the HORYZON: Moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis
Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Bendall, S., Lederman, R., Wadley, G., Chinnery, G., Vargas, S., Larkin, M., Killackey, E., McGorry, P. D., & Gleeson, J. F. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.009 · Cited by 224
Schizophrenia--Time to Commit to Policy Change
Fleischhacker, W. W., Arango, C., Arteel, P., Barnes, T. R. E., Carpenter, W., Duckworth, K., Galderisi, S., Halpern, L., Knapp, M., Marder, S. R., et al. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu006 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Gafoor, R., Nitsch, D., McCrone, P., Craig, T. K. J., Garety, P. A., Power, P., & McGuire, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 372-376
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2161060346
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of early intervention on 5-year outcome in non-affective psychosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066050
- The paper
- Gafoor, R., Nitsch, D., McCrone, P., Craig, T. K. J., Garety, P. A., Power, P., & McGuire, P. (2010). Effect of early intervention on 5-year outcome in non-affective psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
