Cited by 248Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Reappraising the long-term course and outcome of psychotic disorders: the AESOP-10 study

Open access
Morgan, C., Lappin, J., Heslin, M., Donoghue, K., Lomas, B., Reininghaus, U., Onyejiaka, A., Croudace, T. +5 more·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of the long-term course and outcome of psychoses tend to focus on cohorts of prevalent cases. Such studies bias samples towards those with poor outcomes, which may distort our understanding of prognosis. Long-term follow-up studies of epidemiologically robust first-episode samples are rare. METHOD: AESOP-10 is a 10-year follow-up study of 557 individuals with a first episode of psychosis initially identified in two areas in the UK (South East London and Nottingham). Detailed information was collated on course and outcome in three domains (clinical, social and service use) from case records, informants and follow-up interviews. RESULTS: At follow-up, of 532 incident cases identified, at baseline 37 (7%) had died, 29 (6%) had emigrated and eight (2%) were excluded. Of the remaining 458, 412 (90%) were traced and some information on follow-up was collated for 387 (85%). Most cases (265, 77%) experienced at least one period of sustained remission; at follow-up, 141 (46%) had been symptom free for at least 2 years. A majority (208, 72%) of cases had been employed for less than 25% of the follow-up period. The median number of hospital admissions, including at first presentation, was 2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-4]; a majority (299, 88%) were admitted a least once and a minority (21, 6%) had 10 or more admissions. Overall, outcomes were worse for those with a non-affective diagnosis, for men and for those from South East London. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained periods of symptom remission are usual following first presentation to mental health services for psychosis, including for those with a non-affective disorder; almost half recover.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714000282

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bleuler M The Schizophrenia Disorders: Long-Term Patient and Family Studies 1978 Yale University Press New Haven and London
  2. Harrison G Mason P Hopper K Harrison G Janca A Sartorius N Nottingham, UK Recovery from Schizophrenia: An International Perspective 2007 177 188 Oxford University Press Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, C., Lappin, J., Heslin, M., Donoghue, K., Lomas, B., Reininghaus, U., Onyejiaka, A., Croudace, T., Jones, P. B., Murray, R. M., Fearon, P., Doody, G. A., & Dazzan, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Morgan, C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
44
Issue
13
Pages
2713-2726
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2000164531
Cited by
248
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PDF-2011-04-065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, long-term outcomes, prognosis, symptom remission, sustained remission, employment, hospitalization, service utilization, social functioning, non-affective psychosis, sex differences, ethnic differences
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, London, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Sex Factors, Incidence, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review