The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bifrontal, bitemporal and right unilateral electrode placement in ECT: randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for major depression. Optimising efficacy and minimising cognitive impairment are goals of ongoing technical refinements. Aims: To compare the efficacy and cognitive effects of a novel electrode placement, bifrontal, with two standard electrode placements, bitemporal and right unilateral in ECT. Method: This multicentre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT00069407) was carried out from 2001 to 2006. A total of 230 individuals with major depression, bipolar and unipolar, were randomly assigned to one of three electrode placements during a course of ECT: bifrontal at one and a half times seizure threshold, bitemporal at one and a half times seizure threshold and right unilateral at six times seizure threshold. Results: All three electrode placements resulted in both clinically and statistically significant antidepressant outcomes. Remission rates were 55% (95% CI 43–66%) with right unilateral, 61% with bifrontal (95% CI 50–71%) and 64% (95% CI 53–75%) with bitemporal. Bitemporal resulted in a more rapid decline in symptom ratings over the early course of treatment. Cognitive data revealed few differences between the electrode placements on a variety of neuropsychological instruments. Conclusions: Each electrode placement is a very effective antidepressant treatment when given with appropriate electrical dosing. Bitemporal leads to more rapid symptom reduction and should be considered the preferred placement for urgent clinical situations. The cognitive profile of bifrontal is not substantially different from that of bitemporal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Patients who fail repeated medication trials, hospitalisation, and psychotherapy sometimes go on to try neurostimulatory treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or deep brain stimulation, all of which can be effective to some extent; but none are 100% effective.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,118
A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary
Levin, H. S. (1993) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005 · Cited by 4,796
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Wilkinson, 1993, Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-3) Administration Manual
- First, 1995, Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM–IV Disorders – Patient Edition (SCID–I/P, Version 2.0)
- Schmidt, 1996, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: A Handbook
- 10.1056/NEJM199303253281204 · DOI
- Delis, 2001, The D–KEFS Sorting Test
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malhi, G. S., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fritz, K., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Murray, G., et al. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415617657 · Cited by 842
“Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(12) study failed to show a cognitive advantage for bifrontal ECT (Kellner et al., 2010) though the large amount of missing cognitive data in this study makes the findings difficult to interpret.”
BackgroundInfluentialMilev, R. V., Giacobbe, P., Kennedy, S. H., Blumberger, D. M., Daskalakis, Z. J., Downar, J., Modirrousta, M., Patry, S., Vila-Rodriguez, F., Lam, R. W., et al. (2016) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743716660033 · Cited by 586
Parikh, S. V., Quilty, L. C., Ravitz, P., Rosenbluth, M., Pavlova, B., Grigoriadis, S., Velyvis, V., Kennedy, S. H., Lam, R. W., MacQueen, G. M., et al. (2016) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743716659418 · Cited by 562
Prognosis and improved outcomes in major depression: a review
Kraus, C., Kadriu, B., Lanzenberger, R., Zarate, C. A., & Kasper, S. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0460-3 · Cited by 482
Espinoza, R. T., & Kellner, C. H. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2034954 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellner, C. H., Knapp, R., Husain, M. M., Rasmussen, K., Sampson, S., Cullum, M., McClintock, S. M., Tobias, K. G., Martino, C., Mueller, M., Bailine, S. H., Fink, M., & Petrides, G.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
- Northwell Health (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kellner, Charles H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-234
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- PMC
- PMC2830057
- OpenAlex
- W2149516065
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 19.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- electroconvulsive therapy, electrode placement, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, seizure threshold, antidepressant efficacy, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electrodes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Remission Induction, Seizures, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
