Cited by 71Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Ethnicity and coercion among involuntarily detained psychiatric in-patients

Open access
Bennewith, Olive, Amos, Tim, Lewis, Glyn, Katsakou, Christina, Wykes, Til, Morriss, Richard, Priebe, Stefan·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

We assessed whether adult Black and minority ethnic (BME) patients detained for involuntary psychiatric treatment experienced more coercion than similar White patients. We found no evidence of this from patient interviews or from hospital records. The area (mental health trust) where people were treated was strongly associated with both the experience of coercion and the recording of a coercive measure in their records. Regarding charges of institutional racism in psychiatry, this study highlights the importance of investigating the role of area characteristics when assessing the relationship between ethnicity and patient management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.068890

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennewith, O., Amos, T., Lewis, G., Katsakou, C., Wykes, T., Morriss, R., & Priebe, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Bennewith, Olive
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-01
Volume
196
Issue
1
Pages
75-76
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2086377174
Cited by
71
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (0230072, RP-PG-0606-1050)
  • Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric detention, coercion in mental health care, institutional racism, ethnic disparities, area deprivation, mental health trusts, coercive measures, patient experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Coercion, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, United Kingdom, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Prejudice, Mentally Ill Persons, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Black People, White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review