Cited by 20Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the Short Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder Screener (SOCS) in children and adolescents

Open access
Piqueras, José A., Rodríguez-Jiménez, Tíscar, Ortiz, Ana G., Moreno, Elena, Lázaro, Luisa, Godoy, Antonio·2015·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: The Short Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder Screener (SOCS) is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence as a suitable and validated screening tool for 11- to 15-year olds. Despite its excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), it has limitations. Aims: To empirically examine whether the SOCS is suitable for assessing OCD symptoms across a wide age range of children and adolescents and to provide new data about its psychometric properties. Method: Participants were 94 patients (9–19 years) with OCD, and 880 healthy controls. Results: The results supported the SOCS' unidimensional factor structure and metric invariance across samples. It showed good reliability in terms of internal consistency and temporal stability. Furthermore, it had significantly high correlations with other OCD measures and an acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting OCD. Conclusions: The SOCS is a brief screening tool suitable for detecting OCD in children and adolescents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.000695

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SOCS is considered a well-established instrument to assess OCD in adolescent clinical samples with comparable psychometric properties to other OCD self-report tools.

    “It is considered a well-established instrument to assess OCD in adolescent clinical samples with comparable psychometric properties to other OCD self-report tools [141]”

    From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Discussion (‘Use of the SOCS’; page not available) says the SOCS has psychometric properties comparable to other self-report tools and can be considered ‘well-established, or at least a promising’ paediatric OCD assessment instrument. The paper includes an adolescent clinical sample, but the citing sentence omits the authors’ qualification that ‘promising’ may be the more appropriate classification. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cohen, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science
  2. Nunnally, 1994, Psychometric Theory.
  3. 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM-IV)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piqueras, J. A., Rodríguez-Jiménez, T., Ortiz, A. G., Moreno, E., Lázaro, L., & Godoy, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2015-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
21-26
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2198950742
Cited by
20
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad de Málaga
  • Universitat de Barcelona
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, children and adolescents, screening tool validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, metric invariance, sensitivity and specificity, internal consistency, temporal stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review