The DOI matches its Crossref record.
I-mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (i-MBCT) in the treatment of COVID-19 related adjustment disorder. a RCT study with active control group
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Adjustment disorder (AD) is described as a maladaptive reaction to an identifiable psychosocial stressor/s that usually emerges within a month after the onset of the stressor. With all uncertainty, fears and disorientation, it’s no surprise that many people have developed an AD linked to the sudden changes brought about by COVID-19, such as threat to life, imposed restrictions, and the associated changes. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) has been found to be effective for depression and anxiety problems, little is known, however, about its efficacy for adjustment disorder. Objectives: The aim of the current research was to evaluate if 4 weeks long, modified internet-delivered MBCT can reduce symptoms of Covid-19 related AD. Methods: 438 individuals with a diagnosis of AD were recruited to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to i-MBCT, i-progressive muscle relaxation training (i-PMR), and Waiting List (WL). Assessments with questionnaires evaluating AD (ADMN-20), depression (PHQ-9, HADS-D), and anxiety (HADS-A, GAD-7) were filled at baseline, 4-week, and 1-month post-randomization. 142 individuals completed baseline and 4 week assessment (i-MBCT, n= 34; i-PMR, n= 36 and WL, n=72). Results: We found a significant reduction in AD symptoms following the i-MBCT group, whereas no change was found in both control conditions. While a decrease in depressive and anxiety was found in both i-MBCT and i-PMR groups, the greatest reduction has been observed in i-MBCT. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that i-MBCT can be an effective intervention in treating Covid-19 related AD, but more studies are needed. Disclosure: No significant relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The eMBCT study showed a significant reduction of AjD symptoms in the experimental group compared with the control condition.
“Its results were promising and showed a significant reduction of AjD symptoms in the experimental group compared with the control condition.”
From Effectiveness and mediators of change of an online CBT intervention for students with adjustment disorder—study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [92]
The Results (p. S100) report a significant reduction in adjustment-disorder symptoms after i-MBCT and no change in either control condition. They do not report a statistically significant between-group comparison, which the phrase “compared with the control condition” may imply. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is only one study in Poland conducted on a population of people experiencing AjD, which evaluated the efficacy of online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT).
“To our knowledge, there is only one such study in Poland conducted on a population of people experiencing AjD. The study evaluated the efficacy of online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT) [92].”
From Effectiveness and mediators of change of an online CBT intervention for students with adjustment disorder—study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [92]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Juszczyk-Kalina, A., Holas, P., & Farchione, T. J. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07744-9 · Cited by 4
“The study evaluated the efficacy of online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT) [92].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHolas, P., Juszczyk-Kalina, A., Wardęszkiewicz, J., Ciarrochi, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13080934 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHolas, P., Juszczyk-Kalina, A., Ciarrochi, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3576580/v1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holas, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Holas, P.
- ORCID
- Holas, P.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S100-S100
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- PMC
- PMC9471222
- OpenAlex
- W3194247855
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- online therapy, adjustment disorder, COVID-19 pandemic, progressive muscle relaxation, depression, anxiety, psychological stress, psychotherapy efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review