Cited by 1Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Generative models as computational assays for psychiatry

Open access
Frässle, S.·2023·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Abstract Psychiatry faces fundamental challenges with regard to mechanistically guided differential diagnosis, as well as prediction of clinical trajectories and treatment response. This has motivated novel approaches that aim to develop “computational assays” for inferring patient-specific disease processes from neuroimaging data, which can then be incorporated into decision making in everyday clinical practice. Such computational assays are often based on generative models, which describe how measured data may be caused by a particular mechanism. Combining generative models with machine learning allows translating the inferences from computational assays into patient-specific predictions, an approach referred to as generative embedding. Here, I illustrate the clinical potential of generative embedding for the exemplary case of a generative model of whole-brain effective (directed) connectivity: regression DCM (rDCM). First, I introduce rDCM to the audience and highlight its relevance for understanding the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. I then provide an initial demonstration of the clinical utility of rDCM. Specifically, we assessed the ability of rDCM for predicting future episodes of depression in never-depressed adults, using a large dataset (N=906) of resting-state fMRI data from the UK Biobank. Over a 3-year period, half of the participants showed indications of at least one depressive episode, while the other half did not. Using nested cross-validation for training and a held-out test set (80/20 split), we found that a generative embedding procedure based on rDCM in combination with a support vector machine enables statistically significant predictions of future depressive episodes, both on the training (accuracy: 0.63, area under the curve (AUC): 0.66, p<0.001) and test set (accuracy: 0.62, AUC: 0.64, p<0.001). Interpreting model predictions based on SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) values suggested that the most predictive connections were widely distributed and not confined to specific networks. In summary, generative models of brain connectivity in general, and rDCM in particular, show initial promise to serve as computational assays for psychiatry. Our analyses suggest that (i) fMRI-based generative embedding approaches have some capacity for early detection of individuals at-risk for depression and (ii) achieving accuracies of clinical utility may require combination of fMRI with other data modalities. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.182

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frässle, S.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Frässle, S.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2023-03
Volume
66
Issue
S1
Pages
S50-S50
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W4385669083
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
effective brain connectivity, depression prediction, resting-state fMRI, early detection of depression, SHAP, treatment response prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review