Generative models as computational assays for psychiatry
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Psychiatry faces fundamental challenges with regard to mechanistically guided differential diagnosis, as well as prediction of clinical trajectories and treatment response. This has motivated novel approaches that aim to develop “computational assays” for inferring patient-specific disease processes from neuroimaging data, which can then be incorporated into decision making in everyday clinical practice. Such computational assays are often based on generative models, which describe how measured data may be caused by a particular mechanism. Combining generative models with machine learning allows translating the inferences from computational assays into patient-specific predictions, an approach referred to as generative embedding. Here, I illustrate the clinical potential of generative embedding for the exemplary case of a generative model of whole-brain effective (directed) connectivity: regression DCM (rDCM). First, I introduce rDCM to the audience and highlight its relevance for understanding the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. I then provide an initial demonstration of the clinical utility of rDCM. Specifically, we assessed the ability of rDCM for predicting future episodes of depression in never-depressed adults, using a large dataset (N=906) of resting-state fMRI data from the UK Biobank. Over a 3-year period, half of the participants showed indications of at least one depressive episode, while the other half did not. Using nested cross-validation for training and a held-out test set (80/20 split), we found that a generative embedding procedure based on rDCM in combination with a support vector machine enables statistically significant predictions of future depressive episodes, both on the training (accuracy: 0.63, area under the curve (AUC): 0.66, p<0.001) and test set (accuracy: 0.62, AUC: 0.64, p<0.001). Interpreting model predictions based on SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) values suggested that the most predictive connections were widely distributed and not confined to specific networks. In summary, generative models of brain connectivity in general, and rDCM in particular, show initial promise to serve as computational assays for psychiatry. Our analyses suggest that (i) fMRI-based generative embedding approaches have some capacity for early detection of individuals at-risk for depression and (ii) achieving accuracies of clinical utility may require combination of fMRI with other data modalities. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Embracing computational models opens the door to identifying biomarkers based on circuit function rather than just phenomenology.
“Embracing computational models opens the door to identifying biomarkers based on circuit function rather than just phenomenology (71–73).”
From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shaw, A. D., Sumner, R. L., & Berndt, L. C. S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1713833 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frässle, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Frässle, S.
- ORCID
- Frässle, S.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S50-S50
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- PMC
- PMC10417936
- OpenAlex
- W4385669083
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- effective brain connectivity, depression prediction, resting-state fMRI, early detection of depression, SHAP, treatment response prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review