The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive–behavioural approach to understanding obsessional thinking
Abstract
Background Obsessional ruminations (obsessions without any accompanying overt compulsive behaviour) were previously considered especially difficult to treat. Method Cognitive-behavioural theory regarding obsessional problems is discussed. Strategies for therapy developed on the basis of this theory are reviewed. Results The cognitive-behavioural theory of obsessive-compulsive disorder proposes that obsessional problems occur as a consequence of the particular meaning or significance which patients attach to the occurrence and/or content of intrusive thoughts. When intrusions are interpreted (appraised) as indicating increased personal responsibility, this results in both distress and the occurrence of neutralising behaviour. Cognitive-behavioural treatment seeks to change responsibility beliefs and appraisals, and thereby reduce distress and eliminate neutralising responses which usually occur as covert neutralising (mental rituals). Evidence is emerging for the success of therapy developed on this theoretical basis. Conclusions Recent developments in the psychological conceptualisation of obsessional ruminations have improved the prospects for successful therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clark, D. M. (1986) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2 · Cited by 2,422
Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis
Salkovskis, P. M. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-6 · Cited by 1,842
Self-citationAbnormal and normal obsessions
Rachman, S., & de Silva, P. (1978) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(78)90022-0 · Cited by 1,160
The importance of behaviour in the maintenance of anxiety and panic: A cognitive account
Salkovskis, P. M. (1991) · Behavioural Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s0141347300011472 · Cited by 780
Self-citation
Cited by
Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
(2008) · APA Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Comprehensive Guidelines and Guideline Watches · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423363.149114 · Cited by 1,028
Chamberlain, S. R., Blackwell, A. D., Fineberg, N. A., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.006 · Cited by 830
Understanding and treating obsessive–compulsive disorder
Salkovskis, P. M. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00049-2 · Cited by 732
Self-citation(2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00085-1 · Cited by 590
Responsibility attitudes and interpretations are characteristic of obsessive compulsive disorder
Salkovskis, P. M., Wroe, A. L., Gledhill, A., Morrison, N., Forrester, E., Richards, C., Reynolds, M., & Thorpe, S. (2000) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00071-6 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Salkovskis, P. M., Forrester, E., & Richards, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- S35
- Pages
- 53-63
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2409781394
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive–behavioural approach to understanding obsessional thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/s0007125000297900
- The paper
- Salkovskis, P. M., Forrester, E., & Richards, C. (1998). Cognitive–behavioural approach to understanding obsessional thinking. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000297900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.