Cited by 117Fatty Acid Research and HealthAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Higher efficacy of dietary DHA provided as a phospholipid than as a triglyceride for brain DHA accretion in neonatal piglets

Open access
Liu, Lei, Bartke, Nana, Van Daele, Hans, Lawrence, Peter, Qin, Xia, Park, Hui Gyu, Kothapalli, Kumar, Windust, Anthony +3 more·2014·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Long-chain PUFAs (LCPUFAs) occur in foods primarily in the natural lipid classes, triacylglycerols (TAGs) or phospholipids (PLs). We studied the relative efficacy of the neural omega-3 DHA provided in formula to growing piglets as a dose of (13)C-DHA bound to either TAG or phosphatidylcholine (PC). Piglets were assigned to identical formula-based diets from early life and provided with TAG-(13)C-DHA or PC-(13)C-DHA orally at 16 days. Days later, piglet organs were analyzed for (13)C-DHA and other FA metabolites. PC-(13)C-DHA was 1.9-fold more efficacious for brain gray matter DHA accretion than TAG-(13)C-DHA, and was similarly more efficacious in gray matter synaptosomes, retina, liver, and red blood cells (RBCs). Liver labeling was greatest, implying initial processing in that organ followed by export to other organs, and suggesting that transfer from gut to bloodstream to liver in part drove the difference in relative efficacy for tissue accretion. Apparent retroconversion to 22:5n-3 was more than double for PC-(13)C-DHA and was more prominent in neural tissue than in liver or RBCs. These data directly support greater efficacy for PC as a carrier for LCPUFAs compared with TAG, consistent with previous studies of arachidonic acid and DHA measured in other species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.m045930

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 117

Authors
Liu, L., Bartke, N., Van Daele, H., Lawrence, P., Qin, X., Park, H. G., Kothapalli, K., Windust, A., Bindels, J., Wang, Z., & Brenna, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Nutricia Research (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Brenna, J. Thomas
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
531-539
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010954893
Cited by
117
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, phosphatidylcholine, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, newborn piglets, 13C-labeled fatty acids, synaptosomes, retina, liver, erythrocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Carbon Isotopes, Diet, Dietary Fats, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Erythrocytes, Fatty Acids, Female, Liver, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Phosphatidylcholines, Phospholipids, Retina, Swine, Triglycerides, Arachidonic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review