Cited by 211Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation

Thematic review series: the immune system and atherogenesis. Recent insights into the biology of macrophage scavenger receptors

Open access
Greaves, David R., Gordon, Siamon·2005·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Scavenger receptors were originally defined by their ability to bind and internalize modified lipoproteins. Macrophages express at least six structurally different cell surface receptors for modified forms of LDL that contribute to foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. In addition to their role in the pathology of atherosclerosis, macrophage scavenger receptors, especially SR-A, play critical roles in innate immunity, apoptotic cell clearance, and tissue homeostasis. In this review, we highlight recent advances in understanding the biology of macrophage scavenger receptors as pattern recognition receptors for both infectious nonself (pathogens) and modified self (apoptotic cells and modified LDL). We critically evaluate the potential of scavenger receptors and their ligands as targets for therapeutic intervention in human disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.r400011-jlr200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Associations between self-reported physical activity and TNFR1, TNFR2, IL-6, and CRP in healthy men and women became non-significant after adjusting for BMI and leptin.

    “In contrast, the associations found between self-reported physical activity and TNFR1, TNFR2, IL-6 and CRP concentrations in a study including healthy men from the Men's Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study and healthy women from the Nurses' Health Study (243) were no longer significant when adjusting for BMI and leptin.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 211

Authors
Greaves, D. R., & Gordon, S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Greaves, David R.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049653248
Cited by
211
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Keywords
macrophage scavenger receptor, atherogenesis, atherosclerosis, modified lipoproteins, scavenger receptor A, foam cell formation, pattern recognition receptors, innate immunity, efferocytosis, modified LDL, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Foam Cells, Humans, Immunity, Ligands, Lipoproteins, LDL, Macrophages, Receptors, Immunologic, Receptors, Scavenger, Scavenger Receptors, Class A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review