Cited by 25Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTryptophan and brain disorders

Sex Steroid Regulation of Microglial Cell Activation: Relevance to Multiple Sclerosis

DREW, PAUL D., CHAVIS, JANET A., BHATT, RENU·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) occurs more commonly in females than males. However, the mechanisms resulting in gender differences in MS are unknown. Several studies have suggested that sex steroids influence the development and severity of MS. For example, pregnancy influences MS symptoms, with remission in the third trimester of gestation, followed by exacerbation in the postpartum period. In addition, oral contraceptives containing female sex steroids have been associated with a lower risk of developing MS and decreased disability. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an autoimmune disorder initiated by T cells reactive against central nervous system (CNS) antigens. EAE is characterized by inflammation and demyelination of the CNS, and by remittent paralysis—features consistent with MS. Recent studies have suggested that female sex steroids may modulate EAE, at least in part, through effects on T cells. For example, sex steroids shift T cells toward a Th2 phenotype in vitro, and cytokines produced by Th2 cells generally suppress EAE. Activated microglia also are believed to contribute to MS pathology; perhaps due in part to production of nitric oxide (NO) and TNF‐α, molecules which can be toxic to CNS cells, including oligodendrocytes. We are currently investigating the role of sex steroids in modulating microglial cell function in relation to MS. It is hoped that elucidation of the mechanisms by which sex steroids modulate CNS inflammation will lead to future therapies in the treatment of MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1286.031

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DREW, P. D., CHAVIS, J. A., & BHATT, R.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
DREW, PAUL D.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
1007
Issue
1
Pages
329-334
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2001365095
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RG 3198A1)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 042860, R01NS042860)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
sex steroids, microglial activation, multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, gender differences, pregnancy, oral contraceptives, Th2 cells, neuroinflammation, nitric oxide, TNF-α, demyelination, oligodendrocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review