Cited by 15Vestibular and auditory disordersMotor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Discharge Patterns of Cerebellar Output Neurons in the Caudal Fastigial Nucleus during Head-Free Gaze Shifts in Primates

BRETTLER, S. C.·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Lesion studies in both human and non-human primates indicate that the cerebellum is important for accurate and stereotyped saccadic eye movements. Based on single-unit recordings and pharmacological inactivations in head-fixed monkeys, we suggested that the caudal fastigial nucleus (CFN) provides the brainstem saccade generator with a burst that helps accelerate contraversive saccades and decelerate ipsiversive ones. Here we examine this suggestion during head-free gaze shifts where there can be a 10-fold difference in saccade duration. First, the timing of the burst does not depend on whether the gaze shift has a head component. When a family of either ipsiversive or contraversive gaze shifts with a variety of saccadic durations is aligned on gaze onset, the high-frequency burst in the associated rasters occurs progressively later as saccade duration increases. Realignment of the same rasters with the end of the saccade reveals a tight timing of burst end with saccade end for all 10 CFN burst neurons studied. The delayed bursts for contraversive saccades were unexpected based on the early burst illustrated in the published head-fixed data. One hypothesis is that the late activity helps terminate contraversive as well as ipsiversive gaze shifts. An alternative explanation is that the late CFN burst could still be used as an excitatory drive to promote the late reacceleration or prolonged velocity plateau that is present during large gaze shifts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1303.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaze linked to cerebellar function is characteristically atypical in individuals with autistic disorder, and subtle oculomotor alterations suggest abnormalities in cortico-cerebellar connectivity.

    “Gaze linked to cerebellar function [23] is characteristically atypical in individuals with AD and the observation of subtle oculomotor alterations suggests abnormalities in cortico-cerebellar connectivity [24, 25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRETTLER, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
BRETTLER, S. C.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
1004
Issue
1
Pages
61-68
ISSN
0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088168842
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
saccades, saccade duration, burst timing, primates
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebellar Nuclei, Electrophysiology, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca mulatta, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Saccades, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review