The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel Markers for the Prospective Isolation of Human MSC
Abstract
Abstract: The isolation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from primary tissue is hampered by the limited selectivity of available markers. So far, CD271 is one of the most specific markers for bone marrow (BM)‐derived MSC. In search of additional markers, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with specificity for immature cells were screened by flow cytometry for their specific reactivity with the rare CD271+ population. The recognized CD271+ populations were fractionated by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting and the clonogenic capacity of the sorted cells was analyzed for their ability to give rise to CFU‐F. The results showed that only the CD271 bright but not the CD271 dim population contained CFU‐F. Two‐color flow cytometry analysis revealed that only the CD271 bright population was positive for the established MSC markers CD10, CD13, CD73, and CD105. In addition, a variety of mAbs specific for novel and partially unknown antigens selectively recognized the CD271 bright population but no other BM cells. The new MSC‐specific molecules included the platelet‐derived growth factor receptor‐β (CD140b), HER‐2/erbB2 (CD340), frizzled‐9 (CD349), the recently described W8B2 antigen, as well as cell‐surface antigens defined by the antibodies W1C3, W3D5, W4A5, W5C4, W5C5, W7C6, 9A3, 58B1, F9‐3C2F1, and HEK‐3D6. In conclusion, the described markers are suitable for the prospective isolation of highly purified BM‐MSC. These MSC may be used as an improved starting population for transplantation in diseases like osteogenesis imperfecta, cartilage repair, and myocardial infarction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Current Understanding and Clinical Status
Salem, H. K., & Thiemermann, C. (2010) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.269 · Cited by 915
Covas, D. T., Panepucci, R. A., Fontes, A. M., Silva, W. A., Orellana, M. D., Freitas, M. C. C., Neder, L., Santos, A. R. D., Peres, L. C., Jamur, M. C., et al. (2008) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2007.12.015 · Cited by 610
Schwab, K. E., & Gargett, C. E. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem265 · Cited by 545
The roles of signaling pathways in bone repair and regeneration
Majidinia, M., Sadeghpour, A., & Yousefi, B. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.26042 · Cited by 513
Siegel, G., Kluba, T., Hermanutz-Klein, U., Bieback, K., Northoff, H., & Schäfer, R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-146 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- BÜHRING, H., BATTULA, V. L., TREML, S., SCHEWE, B., KANZ, L., & VOGEL, W.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 1106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 262-271
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1998246678
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Markers for the Prospective Isolation of Human MSC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1196/annals.1392.000
- The paper
- BÜHRING, H., BATTULA, V. L., TREML, S., SCHEWE, B., KANZ, L., & VOGEL, W. (2007). Novel Markers for the Prospective Isolation of Human MSC. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1392.000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.