Preventive Care in the Emergency Department: Screening and Brief Intervention for Alcohol Problems in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the medical literature in order to determine the strength of the recommendation for screening and brief intervention (SBI) for alcohol‐related problems in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: The review followed the methodology of systematic reviews and was facilitated through the use of a structured template, a companion explanatory piece, and a grading and methodological scoring system based on published criteria for critical appraisal. The primary outcome measure was the prevention of mortality and morbidity secondary to alcohol‐related illnesses/injuries. The secondary outcome measures included: decreased consumption; fewer ED/outpatient visits and hospitalizations; a decrease in social consequences; and increased referrals for follow‐up and/or treatment. Three Medline searches as well as a search of the Cochrane Library were performed. Two team members reviewed the abstracts and selected pertinent articles. References were screened for additional pertinent articles. Results: Twenty‐seven articles were identified and reviewed, in addition to the 14 primary articles included in the 1996 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Report. The study populations were diverse, including inpatient, outpatient, and college settings, with ages ranging from 12 to 70 years. Four studies were ED‐based and two included EDs as one of multiple sites. Thirty‐nine studies on SBI, 30 randomized controlled and nine cohort, were used to formulate the c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of brief interventions in an Emergency Department has been shown to be a cost-effective and sustainable strategy to reduce alcohol consumption and number of binge drinking episodes.
“The use of BIs in an ED has been shown to be a cost-effective [10] and sustainable strategy to reduce alcohol consumption [7,10,11], and number of binge drinking episodes [7]; still, there are many opportunities to improve the implementation of a BI in the ED to promote equitable reach, adoption and intervention fidelity [12]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 178
- Authors
- D'Onofrio, G., & Degutis, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- ORCID
- Degutis, Linda C.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-638
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W4231781704
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- screening and brief intervention, alcohol-related problems, emergency department, alcoholism, alcohol-related injuries, alcohol consumption reduction, hospitalization and emergency department visits, referral to treatment, university students, clinical guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review