The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Queueing Theory to Increase the Effectiveness of Emergency Department Provider Staffing
Abstract
Objectives: Significant variation in emergency department (ED) patient arrival rates necessitates the adjustment of staffing patterns to optimize the timely care of patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a queueing model in identifying provider staffing patterns to reduce the fraction of patients who leave without being seen. Methods: The authors collected detailed ED arrival data from an urban hospital and used a Lag SIPP queueing analysis to gain insights on how to change provider staffing to decrease the proportion of patients who leave without being seen. The authors then compared this proportion for the same 39‐week period before and after the resulting changes. Results: Despite an increase in arrival volume of 1,078 patients (6.3%), an average increase in provider hours of 12 hours per week (3.1%) resulted in 258 fewer patients who left without being seen. This represents a decrease in the proportion of patients who left without being seen by 22.9%. Restricting attention to a four‐day subset of the week during which there was no increase in total provider hours, a reallocation of providers based on the queueing model resulted in 161 fewer patients who left without being seen (21.7%), despite an additional 548 patients (5.5%) arriving in the second half of the study. Conclusions: Timely access to a provider is a critical dimension of ED quality performance. In an environment in which EDs are often understaffed, analyses of arrival patterns and the use of queueing models can be extremely useful in identifying the most effective allocation of staff.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Application of queueing theory in health care: A literature review
C, L., & Appa Iyer, S. (2013) · Operations Research for Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.orhc.2013.03.002 · Cited by 161
A stochastic optimization model for shift scheduling in emergency departments
EL-Rifai, O., Garaix, T., Augusto, V., & Xie, X. (2015) · Health Care Management Science · doi:10.1007/s10729-014-9300-4 · Cited by 97
An Emergency Department Patient Flow Model Based on Queueing Theory Principles
Wiler, J. L., Bolandifar, E., Griffey, R. T., Poirier, R. F., & Olsen, T. (2013) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12215 · Cited by 69
Kaushal, A., Zhao, Y., Peng, Q., Strome, T., Weldon, E., Zhang, M., & Chochinov, A. (2015) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2015.02.002 · Cited by 74
Analytics for Hospital Resource Planning—Two Case Studies
Xie, J., Zhuang, W., Ang, M., Chou, M. C., Luo, L., & Yao, D. D. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13158 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, L. V., Soares, J., Giglio, J. F., & Green, R. A.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-68
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W1983315917
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.