The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of a Patient-Accessible Electronic Medical Record in a Practice for Congestive Heart Failure: Patient and Physician Experiences
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the experiences of patients and physicians in a clinical trial of an online electronic medical record (SPPARO, System Providing Patients Access to Records Online). DESIGN: Quantitative data were obtained from questionnaires. Qualitative data were obtained from individual interviews and focus groups. MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaire items were based on issues identified by patients and physicians in previous studies. Individual interviews and focus groups were performed using a semistructured format developed through an iterative process. RESULTS: Of the eight physicians who participated in the trial, seven completed questionnaires and interviews. Of the 394 patients in the practice, 107 enrolled in the study, and 54 were assigned randomly to the intervention group. Of these, 41 used SPPARO during the trial period. In questionnaires and interviews, patients were significantly more likely than physicians to anticipate benefits of SPPARO and less likely to anticipate problems. Attitudes of subjects did not diverge from controls after the intervention period. In posttrial focus groups, SPPARO users described its practical benefits. Comprehending medical jargon was a minor obstacle. Physicians anticipated that implementing SPPARO might increase their workload and distort their clinical interactions. In posttrial interviews, physicians and staff reported no change in their workload and no adverse consequences. All of the physicians ultimately supported the concept of giving patients online access to their clinical notes and test results. CONCLUSION: SPPARO was useful for a number of patients. Physicians initially voiced a number of concerns about implementing SPPARO, but their experience with it was far more positive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The success of initiatives that provides patients with the access to their electronic healthcare records, such as OpenNotes, suggests their potential to improve the quality and efficiency of medical care [1, 2].”
From Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Guyatt, G. H. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.270.17.2096 · Cited by 3,083
Green, C. P., Porter, C. B., Bresnahan, D. R., & Spertus, J. A. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00531-3 · Cited by 1,827
Giacomini, M. K., Cook, D. J., & for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.357 · Cited by 931
The Effects of Promoting Patient Access to Medical Records: A Review
Ross, S. E., & Lin, C. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1147 · Cited by 333
Self-citationRoss, S. E., Moore, L. A., Earnest, M. A., Wittevrongel, L., & Lin, C. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12 · Cited by 280
Self-citationGiving Patients Access to Their Medical Records via the Internet: The PCASSO Experience
Masys, D. R. (2002) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1005 · Cited by 156
Using an Internet Comanagement Module to Improve the Quality of Chronic Disease Care
Goldberg, H. I., Ralston, J. D., Hirsch, I. B., Hoath, J. I., & Ahmed, K. I. (2003) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety · doi:10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29053-5 · Cited by 68
Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients.
Fisher, B., & Britten, N. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 64
What Do Patients Do with Access to Their Medical Records?
Cimino, J. J., Patel, V. L., & Kushniruk, A. W. (2001) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-1440 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 · Cited by 851
Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead
Delbanco, T., Walker, J., Bell, S. K., Darer, J. D., Elmore, J. G., Farag, N., Feldman, H. J., Mejilla, R., Ngo, L. H., Ralston, J. D., et al. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002 · Cited by 686
Self-citationA 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care
Davis, K. C., Schoenbaum, S. C., & Audet, A. J. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0178.x · Cited by 683
Personal health records: a scoping review
Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., & Straus, S. E. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105 · Cited by 573
Mamoshina, P., Ojomoko, L., Yanovich, Y., Ostrovski, A., Botezatu, A., Prikhodko, P., Izumchenko, E., Aliper, A., Romantsov, K., Zhebrak, A., et al. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.22345 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Earnest, M. A., Ross, S. E., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L. A., & Lin, C.-T.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ross, Stephen E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 410-417
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC516248
- OpenAlex
- W2109294163
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- online access to medical records, congestive heart failure, patient experience, physician experience, physician workload, clinical interaction, patient-provider communication
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Focus Groups, Patient Access to Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
