Cited by 24Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

A Case for Manual Entry of Structured, Coded Laboratory Data from Multiple Sources into an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record

Open access
Staes, C. J., Bennett, S. T., Evans, R. S., Narus, S. P., Huff, S. M., Sorensen, J. B.·2006·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Laboratory results provide necessary information for the management of ambulatory patients. To realize the benefits of an electronic health record (EHR) and coded laboratory data (e.g., decision support and improved data access and display), results from laboratories that are external to the health care enterprise need to be integrated with internal results. We describe the development and clinical impact of integrating external results into the EHR at Intermountain Health Care (IHC). During 2004, over 14,000 external laboratory results for 128 liver transplant patients were added to the EHR. The results were used to generate computerized alerts that assisted clinicians with managing laboratory tests in the ambulatory setting. The external results were sent from 85 different facilities and can now be viewed in the EHR integrated with IHC results. We encountered regulatory, logistic, economic, and data quality issues that should be of interest to others developing similar applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1197/jamia.m1813

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Staes C. Development of an information system for the management of liver transplant patients [dissertation]. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 2005 (in progress).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staes, C. J., Bennett, S. T., Evans, R. S., Narus, S. P., Huff, S. M., & Sorensen, J. B.
Affiliations
Intermountain Healthcare (US)
Corresponding author
Staes, C. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
12-15
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2165930195
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
electronic health records, laboratory data integration, manual data entry, automated alerts, liver transplant recipients, outpatient care, data quality, health information exchange, Intermountain Healthcare
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Information Systems, Clinical Laboratory Information Systems, Forms and Records Control, Humans, User-Computer Interface, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review