Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HealthMap: Global Infectious Disease Monitoring through Automated Classification and Visualization of Internet Media Reports

Open access
Freifeld, C. C., Mandl, K. D., Reis, B. Y., Brownstein, J. S.·2008·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Unstructured electronic information sources, such as news reports, are proving to be valuable inputs for public health surveillance. However, staying abreast of current disease outbreaks requires scouring a continually growing number of disparate news sources and alert services, resulting in information overload. Our objective is to address this challenge through the HealthMap.org Web application, an automated system for querying, filtering, integrating and visualizing unstructured reports on disease outbreaks. DESIGN: This report describes the design principles, software architecture and implementation of HealthMap and discusses key challenges and future plans. MEASUREMENTS: We describe the process by which HealthMap collects and integrates outbreak data from a variety of sources, including news media (e.g., Google News), expert-curated accounts (e.g., ProMED Mail), and validated official alerts. Through the use of text processing algorithms, the system classifies alerts by location and disease and then overlays them on an interactive geographic map. We measure the accuracy of the classification algorithms based on the level of human curation necessary to correct misclassifications, and examine geographic coverage. RESULTS: As part of the evaluation of the system, we analyzed 778 reports with HealthMap, representing 87 disease categories and 89 countries. The automated classifier performed with 84% accuracy, demonstrating significant usefulness in managing the large volume of information processed by the system. Accuracy for ProMED alerts is 91% compared to Google News reports at 81%, as ProMED messages follow a more regular structure. CONCLUSION: HealthMap is a useful free and open resource employing text-processing algorithms to identify important disease outbreak information through a user-friendly interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1197/jamia.m2544

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Grein, 2000, Emerging infectious diseases, 6, 97, 10.3201/eid0602.000201 · DOI
  2. Heymann, 2001, The Lancet infectious diseases, 1, 345, 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00148-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1985, Communications of the ACM, 28, 680, 10.1145/3894.3895 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 1997, Communications of the ACM, 40, 19
  5. 2006, Science, 314, 1363d, 10.1126/science.314.5804.1363d · doi:10.1126/science.314.5804.1363d
  6. 2007, The Lancet infectious diseases, 7, 91, 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70018-X · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70018-x
  7. Mykhalovskiy, 2006, Canadian journal of public health. Revue canadienne de sant publique, 97, 42, 10.1007/BF03405213 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eysenbach, 2003, Journal of medical Internet research [electronic resource], 5, e14, 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e14 · DOI
  9. Morse, 1996, Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 38, 135, 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00863-9 · DOI
  10. 2004, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 39, 227, 10.1086/422003 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Madoff, 2005, Archives of medical research, 36, 724, 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.06.005 · DOI
  12. 2004, Communications of the ACM, 47, 47
  13. 2005, 38, 14
  14. Stix, 2001, Scientific American, 284, 28, 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-28 · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0501-28
  15. Gratz, 1999, Annual review of entomology, 44, 51, 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.51 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dobson, 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 356, 1001, 10.1098/rstb.2001.0900 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 194
  18. 2001, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52, 391, 10.1002/1532-2890(2001)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1083>3.0.CO;2-1 · doi:10.1002/1532-2890(2001)9999:9999<::aid-asi1083>3.0.co;2-1

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Freifeld, C. C., Mandl, K. D., Reis, B. Y., & Brownstein, J. S.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
150-157
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2120467164
Cited by
499
References
1
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HealthMap: Global Infectious Disease Monitoring through Automated Classification and Visualization of Internet Media Reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1197/jamia.m2544
The paper
Freifeld, C. C., Mandl, K. D., Reis, B. Y., & Brownstein, J. S. (2008). HealthMap: Global Infectious Disease Monitoring through Automated Classification and Visualization of Internet Media Reports. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2544

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.