Cited by 331Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsResearch Data Management PracticesEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management

Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions

Farley, Scott S, Dawson, Andria, Goring, Simon J, Williams, John W·2018·BioScience

Abstract

Ecology has joined a world of big data. Two complementary frameworks define big data: data that exceed the analytical capacities of individuals or disciplines or the “Four Vs” axes of volume, variety, veracity, and velocity. Variety predominates in ecoinformatics and limits the scalability of ecological science. Volume varies widely. Ecological velocity is low but growing as data throughput and societal needs increase. Ecological big-data systems include in situ and remote sensors, community data resources, biodiversity databases, citizen science, and permanent stations. Technological solutions include the development of open code- and data-sharing platforms, flexible statistical models that can handle heterogeneous data and sources of uncertainty, and cloud-computing delivery of high-velocity computing to large-volume analytics. Cultural solutions include training targeted to early and current scientific workforce and strengthening collaborations among ecologists and data scientists. The broader goal is to maximize the power, scalability, and timeliness of ecological insights and forecasting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biy068

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Central challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques.

    “Central challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques26.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 143 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J., & Williams, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Mount Royal University (CA)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
563-576
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2883471235
Cited by
331
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
26.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BioScience (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Keywords
ecoinformatics, data scalability, remote sensing, citizen science, biodiversity databases, open data sharing, cloud computing, uncertainty quantification, ecological forecasting, data science education, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review