Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems
Open accessAbstract
Background The most effective decision support systems are integrated with clinical information systems, such as inpatient and outpatient electronic health records (EHRs) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Purpose The goal of this project was to describe and quantify the results of a study of decision support capabilities in Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) certified electronic health record systems. Methods The authors conducted a series of interviews with representatives of nine commercially available clinical information systems, evaluating their capabilities against 42 different clinical decision support features. Results Six of the nine reviewed systems offered all the applicable event-driven, action-oriented, real-time clinical decision support triggers required for initiating clinical decision support interventions. Five of the nine systems could access all the patient-specific data items identified as necessary. Six of the nine systems supported all the intervention types identified as necessary to allow clinical information systems to tailor their interventions based on the severity of the clinical situation and the user's workflow. Only one system supported all the offered choices identified as key to allowing physicians to take action directly from within the alert. Discussion The principal finding relates to system-by-system variability. The best system in our analysis had only a single missing feature (from 42…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large 2015 survey found that 95% of respondents had implemented drug-allergy, drug-drug, or drug-laboratory interaction alerts.
“CDS alerts are included in all major commercial electronic health records (EHRs); a large 2015 survey found that 95% of respondents had implemented drug–allergy, drug–drug, or drug–laboratory interaction alerts.8”
From Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
CDS alerts are included in all major commercial electronic health records (EHRs).
“CDS alerts are included in all major commercial electronic health records (EHRs); a large 2015 survey found that 95% of respondents had implemented drug–allergy, drug–drug, or drug–laboratory interaction alerts.8”
From Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians
Balas, E. A. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.3.301 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saeed, M., Villarroel, M., Reisner, A. T., Clifford, G., Lehman, L.-W., Moody, G., Heldt, T., Kyaw, T. H., Moody, B., & Mark, R. G. (2011) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31820a92c6 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Wearables and the Medical Revolution
Dunn, J., Runge, R., & Snyder, M. (2018) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme-2018-0044 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Wang, D., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., Zhu, H., Gao, Y., Fan, X., & Tian, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445432 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative
McCoy, A. B., Russo, E. M., Johnson, K. B., Addison, B., Patel, N., Wanderer, J. P., Mize, D. E., Jackson, J. G., Reese, T. J., Littlejohn, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac027 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wright, A., Sittig, D. F., Ash, J. S., Sharma, S., Pang, J. E., & Middleton, B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Memorial Hermann (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wright, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-644
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC2744714
- OpenAlex
- W2138993334
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 26.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (HHHSA 29020080010)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R56LM006942, R56-LM006942-07A1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- clinical decision support, electronic health records, computerized physician order entry, clinical information systems, alert response, system variability
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Software Design, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, United States, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review