The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis
Abstract
It is well known that statistical power calculations can be valuable in planning an experiment. There is also a large literature advocating that power calculations be made whenever one performs a statistical test of a hypothesis and one obtains a statistically nonsignificant result. Advocates of such post-experiment power calculations claim the calculations should be used to aid in the interpretation of the experimental results. This approach, which appears in various forms, is fundamentally flawed. We document that the problem is extensive and present arguments to demonstrate the flaw in the logic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Post-hoc power analysis is criticized because the type II error calculated using the results of negative clinical trials is always high, which sometimes leads to incorrect conclusions regarding power [13,14].”
From Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Cohen, J. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · Cited by 5,870
Fundamentals of Biostatistics.
(1969) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-70-4-873 · Cited by 4,573
Schuirmann, D. J. (1987) · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1007/bf01068419 · Cited by 2,696
Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy
Goodman, S. N. (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00008 · Cited by 1,188
Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes Factor
Goodman, S. N. (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019 · Cited by 913
Statistical Power Analysis can Improve Fisheries Research and Management
Peterman, R. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f90-001 · Cited by 788
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Voller, J., & Voller, J. (2011) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/(issn)1937-2817 · Cited by 709
Goodman, S. N., & Berlin, J. A. (1994) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-3-199408010-00008 · Cited by 658
Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets
Berger, R. L., & Hsu, J. C. (1996) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1032280304 · Cited by 621
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Anon, 1998, Animal Behavior, 55, i
- Hauck W. W., 1996, Statistical Science, 11, 303
- Smith A. D., 1983, The Compass of Sigma Gamma Epsilon, 61, 22
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Linear and Non-Linear Regression Methods in Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Vittinghoff, E., McCulloch, C. E., Glidden, D. V., & Shiboski, S. C. (2011) · Essential Statistical Methods for Medical Statistics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53737-9.50006-2 · Cited by 6
Abdaoui, H., Barki, C., Dergaa, I., Tlili, K., Ceylan, H. İ., Bragazzi, N. L., de Giorgio, A., Ben Salah, R., & Rahmouni, H. B. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering13010030 · Cited by 6
- Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Hoenig, John M
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2069523442
- Cited by
- 2,046
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 213 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 42.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- statistical power, non-significant results, experimental design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
