The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest–Posttest Trial
Abstract
Several possible methods used to evaluate treatment effects in a randomized pretest–posttest trial with two treatment groups are the two-sample t test, the paired t test, analysis of covariance I (ANCOVA I), the analysis of covariance II (ANCOVA II), and generalized estimating equations (GEE). The ANCOVA I includes treatment and baseline response as covariates in a linear model and ANCOVA II additionally includes an interaction term between the baseline response and treatment indicator as a covariate. The parameters in the ANCOVAI and ANCOVAII models are generally estimated using ordinary least squares. In this article, a semiparametric model, which makes no assumptions about the response distributions, is used. The asymptotic properties of the estimators derived from these five methods and their relative efficiencies are discussed under this semiparametric model. We show that all these methods yield consistent estimators for the treatment effect which have asymptotically normal distributions under the semiparametric model. The GEE and the ANCOVA II estimators are asymptotically equivalent and the most efficient. The estimators from other three methods are less efficient except under some special conditions which are outlined in the article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galante, J., Dufour, G., Vainre, M., Wagner, A. P., Stochl, J., Benton, A., Lathia, N., Howarth, E., & Jones, P. B. (2018) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30231-1 · Cited by 516
Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M., & Lu, X. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3113 · Cited by 349
Self-citationDaniel, R., Zhang, J., & Farewell, D. (2021) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.201900297 · Cited by 167
Steinglass, J. E., Albano, A. M., Simpson, H. B., Wang, Y., Zou, J., Attia, E., & Walsh, B. T. (2014) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22214 · Cited by 158
A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials
Kahan, B. C., Rushton, H., Morris, T. P., & Daniel, R. M. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, L., & Tsiatis, A. A.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314-321
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2155474210
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest–Posttest Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/000313001753272466
- The paper
- Yang, L., & Tsiatis, A. A. (2001). Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest–Posttest Trial. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001753272466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.