Cited by 158Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Confronting fear using exposure and response prevention for anorexia nervosa: A randomized controlled pilot study

Open access
Steinglass, Joanna E., Albano, Anne Marie, Simpson, H. Blair, Wang, Yuanjia, Zou, Jingjing, Attia, Evelyn, Walsh, B. Timothy·2014·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe illness with high rates of relapse. Exposure and Response Prevention for AN (AN‐EXRP) is a new approach that specifically addresses maladaptive eating behavior by targeting eating‐related fear and anxiety. The aim of this study was to evaluate AN‐EXRP as an adjunctive strategy to improve eating behavior during weight restoration, at a pivotal moment when treatment goals shift toward relapse prevention. Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare AN‐EXRP with a comparison condition, Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT). Hospitalized patients with AN (n = 32) who had achieved weight restoration to a BMI > 18.5 kg/m 2 received 12 sessions of either AN‐EXRP or CRT. Outcome was assessed by change in caloric intake in an objective assessment of eating behavior. Results: The average test meal caloric intake of participants who received AN‐EXRP increased from 352 ± 263 kcal at baseline to 401 ± 215 kcal post‐treatment, while that of participants who received CRT decreased from 501 ± 232 kcal at baseline to 424 ± 221 kcal post‐treatment [t(28) = 2.5, p = .02]. Improvement in intake was significantly associated with improvement in eating‐related anxiety (Spearman's ρ = 0.40, p = .03). Discussion: These data demonstrate that AN‐EXRP, compared to a credible comparison intervention, is associated with better caloric intake in a laboratory meal over time in AN. Additional studies are required to determine whether incorporation of these techniques into a longer treatment program leads to enduring and clinically significant change. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2014; 47:174–180)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22214

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in calorie intake in the present study was larger than in other studies.

    “and the increase in calorie intake in the present study was larger than in other studies [41, 42].”

    From Anxiety matters: a pilot lab study into food, weight, and virtual body exposure in anorexia nervosa (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Results (Outcome; page not provided) report a 49-kcal increase in test-meal intake for the AN-EXRP group, supporting this paper as an example of another study with an increase. This source does not report the citing study’s increase, so it cannot establish that the citing study’s increase was larger. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The current findings add to prior research by showing the potential and success of exposure therapy in the treatment of anorectic fears.

    “On the other hand, the current findings add to prior research by showing the potential and success of exposure therapy in the treatment of anorectic fears (e.g. [26, 37, 39, 41–43, 64, 66].”

    From Anxiety matters: a pilot lab study into food, weight, and virtual body exposure in anorexia nervosa (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Discussion reports that the exposure-based intervention improved test-meal intake relative to the control group and suggests potential utility for treatment focused on anxiety and eating behavior. But the Results (Outcome > Anxiety) found no statistically significant difference between groups in anxiety change, so this pilot does not establish success in reducing anorectic fears themselves. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT may be a promising treatment for anorexia nervosa.

    “CBT may be a promising treatment (Calugi et al., 2017; Dalle Grave et al., 2016; Steinglass et al., 2014).”

    From Feasibility of guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with anorexia nervosa (2022) · cites this paper as Steinglass et al., 2014

    The paper describes AN-EXRP as a form of cognitive behavioral therapy and reports improved laboratory-meal caloric intake compared with cognitive remediation therapy (Abstract > Conclusions). Its Discussion calls the change modest and supports further investigation. The study tested a specific, short-term adjunctive CBT-based intervention, not CBT for anorexia nervosa broadly. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure therapy can also be relevant in the treatment of fears seen in anorexia nervosa.

    “Its effectiveness is primarily known from the treatment of anxiety disorders, but an emerging line of research shows that it can also be relevant in the treatment of fears seen in anorexia nervosa (e.g. [16, 25, 35–43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Fairburn CG Marcus MD Wilson GT Fairburn CG Wilson GT Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Binge Eating and Bulimia Nervosa: A Comprehensive Treatment Manual Binge Eating: Nature, Assessment, and Treatment 1993 New York The Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinglass, J. E., Albano, A. M., Simpson, H. B., Wang, Y., Zou, J., Attia, E., & Walsh, B. T.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Steinglass, Joanna E.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
174-180
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2171611171
Cited by
158
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH08273602, K24MH091555, K23MH076195, R01MH082736)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, exposure and response prevention, dietary habits, weight restoration, relapse prevention, cognitive remediation, energy intake, maladaptive eating behaviors, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Anxiety, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Fear, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review