The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separate and Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Event Time Data Using Standard Computer Packages
Abstract
Many clinical trials and other medical and reliability studies generate both longitudinal (repeated measurement) and survival (time to event) data. Many well-established methods exist for analyzing such data separately, but these may be inappropriate when the longitudinal variable is correlated with patient health status, hence the survival endpoint (as well as the possibility of study dropout). To remedy this, an earlier article proposed a joint model for longitudinal and survival data, obtaining maximum likelihood estimates via the EM algorithm. The longitudinal and survival responses are assumed independent given a linking latent bivariate Gaussian process and available covariates. We develop a fully Bayesian version of this approach, implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We use the approach to jointly model the longitudinal and survival data from an AIDS clinical trial comparing two treatments, didanosine (ddI) and zalcitabine (ddC). Despite the complexity of the model, we find it to be relatively straightforward to implement and understand using the WinBUGS software. Wecompare our results to those obtained from readily available alternatives in SAS Procs MIXED, NLMIXED, PHREG, and LIFEREG, as well as Bayesian analogues of these traditional separate likelihood methods. The joint Bayesian approach appears to offer significantly improved and enhanced estimation of median survival times and other parameters of interest, as well as simpler coding and comparable runtimes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Cited by
Pearson, R. M., Evans, J., Kounali, D., Lewis, G., Heron, J., Ramchandani, P. G., O’Connor, T. G., & Stein, A. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2163 · Cited by 589
Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis
Gordon, A. C., Perkins, G. D., Singer, M., McAuley, D. F., Orme, R. M. L., Santhakumaran, S., Mason, A. J., Cross, M., Al-Beidh, F., Best-Lane, J., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1609409 · Cited by 372
Impact of Smoking on Cognitive Decline in Early Old Age: The Whitehall II Cohort Study
Sabia, S., Elbaz, A., Dugravot, A., Head, J., Shipley, M., Hagger-Johnson, G., Kivimaki, M., & Singh-Manoux, A. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2016 · Cited by 235
Ghisletta, P., McArdle, J. J., & Lindenberger, U. (2006) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.3.204 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, X., & Carlin, B. P.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-24
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2063463655
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separate and Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Event Time Data Using Standard Computer Packages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/0003130042854
- The paper
- Guo, X., & Carlin, B. P. (2004). Separate and Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Event Time Data Using Standard Computer Packages. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130042854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.