Cited by 1,172Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Inference

Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model

Royston, P., Moons, K. G M, Altman, D. G, Vergouwe, Y.·2009·BMJ

Abstract

In the second article in their series, Patrick Royston and colleagues describe different approaches to building clinical prognostic models

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.b604

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royston, P., Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., & Vergouwe, Y.
Affiliations
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Royston, P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-03-31
Volume
338
Issue
mar31 1
Pages
b604-b604
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2042080283
Cited by
1,172
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 57
FWCI
41.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Medical Research Council (MC_EX_G0800814)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
prognostic model, prognostic research, clinical prediction model, model development, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Prognosis, Regression Analysis, ROC Curve, Multivariate Analysis, Risk Assessment, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review