The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principal Components and Orthogonal Regression Based on Robust Scales
Abstract
Both principal components analysis (PCA) and orthogonal regression deal with finding a p-dimensional linear manifold minimizing a scale of the orthogonal distances of the m-dimensional data points to the manifold. The main conceptual difference is that in PCA p is estimated from the data, to attain a small proportion of unexplained variability, whereas in orthogonal regression p equals m − 1. The two main approaches to robust PCA are using the eigenvectors of a robust covariance matrix and searching for the projections that maximize or minimize a robust (univariate) dispersion measure. This article is more akin to second approach. But rather than finding the components one by one, we directly undertake the problem of finding, for a given p, a p-dimensional linear manifold minimizing a robust scale of the orthogonal distances of the data points to the manifold. The scale may be either a smooth M-scale or a “trimmed” scale. An iterative algorithm is developed that is shown to converge to a local minimum. A strategy based on random search is used to approximate a global minimum. The procedure is shown to be faster than other high-breakdown-point competitors, especially for large m. The case whereas p = m − 1 yields orthogonal regression. For PCA, a computationally efficient method to choose p is given. Comparisons based on both simulated and real data show that the proposed procedure is more robust than its competitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
An Object-Oriented Framework for Robust Multivariate Analysis
Todorov, V., & Filzmoser, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v032.i03 · Cited by 420
Robust statistics in data analysis — A review
Daszykowski, M., Kaczmarek, K., Vander Heyden, Y., & Walczak, B. (2007) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.06.016 · Cited by 331
ANTIDOTE: understanding and defending against poisoning of anomaly detectors
Rubinstein, B. I. P., Nelson, B., Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Lau, S.-H., Rao, S., Taft, N., & Tygar, J. D. (2009) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1644893.1644895 · Cited by 331
Zhu, J., Ge, Z., Song, Z., & Gao, F. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.003 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Maronna, R.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-273
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2046692379
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal Components and Orthogonal Regression Based on Robust Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/004017005000000166
- The paper
- Maronna, R. (2005). Principal Components and Orthogonal Regression Based on Robust Scales. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017005000000166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.