The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Joint Causal Effect of Nonrandomized Treatments
Abstract
Even in the absence of unmeasured confounding factors or model misspecification, standard methods for estimating the causal effect of time-varying treatments on survival are biased when (a) there exists a time-dependent risk factor for survival that also predicts subsequent treatment, and (b) past treatment history predicts subsequent risk factor level. In contrast, methods based on marginal structural models (MSMs) can provide consistent estimates of causal effects when unmeasured confounding and model misspecification are absent. MSMs are a new class of causal models whose parameters are estimated using a new class of estimators—inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted estimators. We use a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the joint effect of zidovudine (AZT) and prophylaxis therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of HIV-positive men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, an observational study of homosexual men. We obtained an estimated causal mortality rate (hazard) ratio of .67 (conservative 95% confidence interval .46-.98) for AZT and of 1.14 (.79, 1.64) for prophylaxis therapy. These estimates will be consistent for the true causal rate ratios when the functional forms chosen for our models are correct and data have been obtained on all time-independent and time-dependent covariates that predict both subsequent treatment and mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
Robins, J. (1986) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citation
Cited by
Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
Cole, S. R., & Hernan, M. A. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn164 · Cited by 2,796
Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators
Abadie, A. (2005) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/0034-6527.00321 · Cited by 2,286
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models
Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationChallenges of Guarantee-Time Bias
Giobbie-Hurder, A., Gelber, R. D., & Regan, M. M. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.5283 · Cited by 458
Handling drop‐out in longitudinal studies
Hogan, J. W., Roy, J., & Korkontzelou, C. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1728 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernán, M. A., Brumback, B., & Robins, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 454
- Pages
- 440-448
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1963805911
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Joint Causal Effect of Nonrandomized Treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214501753168154
- The paper
- Hernán, M. A., Brumback, B., & Robins, J. M. (2001). Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Joint Causal Effect of Nonrandomized Treatments. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753168154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.