The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model Selection and the Principle of Minimum Description Length
Abstract
This article reviews the principle of minimum description length (MDL) for problems of model selection. By viewing statistical modeling as a means of generating descriptions of observed data, the MDL framework discriminates between competing models based on the complexity of each description. This approach began with Kolmogorov's theory of algorithmic complexity, matured in the literature on information theory, and has recently received renewed attention within the statistics community. Here we review both the practical and the theoretical aspects of MDL as a tool for model selection, emphasizing the rich connections between information theory and statistics. At the boundary between these two disciplines we find many interesting interpretations of popular frequentist and Bayesian procedures. As we show, MDL provides an objective umbrella under which rather disparate approaches to statistical modeling can coexist and be compared. We illustrate the MDL principle by considering problems in regression, nonparametric curve estimation, cluster analysis, and time series analysis. Because model selection in linear regression is an extremely common problem that arises in many applications, we present detailed derivations of several MDL criteria in this context and discuss their properties through a number of examples. Our emphasis is on the practical application of MDL, and hence we make extensive use of real datasets. In writing this review, we tried to make the descriptive philosophy of MDL natural to a statistics audience by examining classical problems in model selection. In the engineering literature, however, MDL is being applied to ever more exotic modeling situations. As a principle for statistical modeling in general, one strength of MDL is that it can be intuitively extended to provide useful tools for new problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
Dawid, A. P. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981683 · Cited by 1,085 · cited 4×
“The reasoning we followed in deriving PMDL is identical to the prequential approach to statistics advocated by Dawid (1984, 1991). The form (18) appeared in the literature on Gaussian regression and time series analysis as the predictive least squares criterion long before the development of MDL, and early work on PMD…”
MethodInfluentialCalibration and empirical Bayes variable selection
George, E. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.4.731 · Cited by 520
Prediction via Orthogonalized Model Mixing
Clyde, M., Desimone, H., & Parmigiani, G. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476989 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics
Steel, M. F. J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20191385 · Cited by 321
A tutorial introduction to the minimum description length principle
Grunwald, P. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0406077 · Cited by 293
Finding approximate POMDP solutions through belief compression
Roy, N., Gordon, G., & Thrun, S. (2005) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1496 · Cited by 254
Finding Haplotype Block Boundaries by Using the Minimum-Description-Length Principle
Anderson, E. C., & Novembre, J. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/377106 · Cited by 90
Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.3.228 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, M. H., & Yu, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 454
- Pages
- 746-774
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1973217014
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 40.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.