The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset: An Information-Theoretic Approach
Abstract
One of the most difficult problems in cluster analysis is identifying the number of groups in a dataset. Most previously suggested approaches to this problem are either somewhat ad hoc or require parametric assumptions and complicated calculations. In this article we develop a simple, yet powerful nonparametric method for choosing the number of clusters based on distortion, a quantity that measures the average distance, per dimension, between each observation and its closest cluster center. Our technique is computationally efficient and straightforward to implement. We demonstrate empirically its effectiveness, not only for choosing the number of clusters, but also for identifying underlying structure, on a wide range of simulated and real world datasets. In addition, we give a rigorous theoretical justification for the method based on information-theoretic ideas. Specifically, results from the subfield of electrical engineering known as rate distortion theory allow us to describe the behavior of the distortion in both the presence and absence of clustering. Finally, we note that these ideas potentially can be extended to a wide range of other statistical model selection problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Cited by
A framework for feature selection in clustering
Witten, D. M., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09415 · Cited by 696
Discovering Activities to Recognize and Track in a Smart Environment
Rashidi, P., Cook, D. J., Holder, L. B., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2010.148 · Cited by 462
Shi, C., Wei, B., Wei, S., Wang, W., Liu, H., & Liu, J. (2021) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-021-01910-w · Cited by 441
Topic modelling for qualitative studies
Nikolenko, S. I., Koltcov, S., & Koltsova, O. (2017) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551515617393 · Cited by 332
Machine Learning in Materials Science: Recent Progress and Emerging Applications
Mueller, T., Kusne, A. G., & Ramprasad, R. (2016) · Reviews in Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9781119148739.ch4 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugar, C. A., & James, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 463
- Pages
- 750-763
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1973041621
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset: An Information-Theoretic Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214503000000666
- The paper
- Sugar, C. A., & James, G. M. (2003). Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset: An Information-Theoretic Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214503000000666
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.