Cited by 6,205Advanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsStatistical Methods and Inference

Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic

Tibshirani, Robert, Walther, Guenther, Hastie, Trevor·2001·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary: We propose a method (the ‘gap statistic’) for estimating the number of clusters (groups) in a set of data. The technique uses the output of any clustering algorithm (e.g. K-means or hierarchical), comparing the change in within-cluster dispersion with that expected under an appropriate reference null distribution. Some theory is developed for the proposal and a simulation study shows that the gap statistic usually outperforms other methods that have been proposed in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9868.00293

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cell cycle often has an enormous impact on cellular gene expression, and this impact can extend to other processes and be affected by them.

    “The cell cycle often has an enormous impact on cellular gene expression146,149,150 (although some87 have challenged this view), but this impact can extend to other processes, and in turn be affected by them.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Tibshirani, Robert
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
411-423
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W101836494
Cited by
6,205
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 372 · 2025: 399 · 2024: 460 · 2023: 456 · 2022: 451 · 2021: 542 · 2020: 493 · 2019: 419 · 2018: 398 · 2017: 329 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 215 · 2014: 230 · 2013: 175 · 2012: 177
FWCI
39.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9971405, 9803645)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
gap statistic, number of clusters, cluster detection, K-means clustering, hierarchical clustering, model selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review