Cited by 13Avian ecology and behaviorEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Using a bird community index to evaluate national parks in the urbanized national capital region

Goodwin, Sarah E., Shriver, W. Gregory·2014·Urban Ecosystems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11252-014-0363-2

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in highly urbanized settings, eastern national parks and other protected forests support higher-integrity bird communities than the surrounding unprotected lands.

    “Even in highly urbanized settings, eastern national parks and other protected forests support higher-integrity bird communities than the surrounding unprotected lands (Goodwin & Shriver, 2014;Timmers et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodwin, S. E., & Shriver, W. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Goodwin, Sarah E.
Venue
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2014-04-27
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
979-990
ISSN
  • 1083-8155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1642
OpenAlex
W1987987315
Cited by
13
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Urban Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Park Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
protected area evaluation, national parks, urbanized landscapes, ecological integrity, habitat structure, point counts, conservation effectiveness, urban biodiversity, small protected areas, land management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review