The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fiducial Generalized Confidence Intervals
Abstract
Generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) and generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) have proven to be useful tools for making inferences in many practical problems. Although GCIs are not guaranteed to have exact frequentist coverage, a number of published and unpublished simulation studies suggest that the coverage probabilities of such intervals are sufficiently close to their nominal value so as to be useful in practice. In this article we single out a subclass of generalized pivotal quantities, which we call fiducial generalized pivotal quantities (FGPQs), and show that under some mild conditions, GCIs constructed using FGPQs have correct frequentist coverage, at least asymptotically. We describe three general approaches for constructing FGPQs—a recipe based on invertible pivotal relationships, and two extensions of it—and demonstrate their usefulness by deriving some previously unknown GPQs and GCIs. It is fair to say that nearly every published GCI can be obtained using one of these recipes. As an interesting byproduct of our investigations, we note that the subfamily of fiducial generalized pivots has a close connection with fiducial inference proposed by R. A. Fisher. This is why we refer to the proposed generalized pivots as fiducial generalized pivotal quantities. We demonstrate these concepts using several examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications: Second Editon
Rao, C. R. (1973) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316436 · Cited by 10,489
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Omori, Y., Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291547 · Cited by 9,084
PE, & Billingsley, P. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291440 · Cited by 6,481
Casella, G., & Berger, R. (2024) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003456285 · Cited by 5,711
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3002019 · Cited by 4,373
THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED
WELCH, B. L. (1947) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · Cited by 4,135
Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications.
Robertson, C. A., & Rao, C. R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529568 · Cited by 3,598
THE FIDUCIAL ARGUMENT IN STATISTICAL INFERENCE
FISHER, R. A. (1935) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1935.tb02120.x · Cited by 593
Fraser, D. A. S. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 360
Exact Statistical Methods for Data Analysis
Clason, D. L., & Weerahandi, S. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669650 · Cited by 264
Cited by
Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: A general approach
Zou, G. Y., & Donner, A. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3095 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Hannig, J., Iyer, H., & Patterson, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 473
- Pages
- 254-269
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1996399172
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fiducial Generalized Confidence Intervals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214505000000736
- The paper
- Hannig, J., Iyer, H., & Patterson, P. (2006). Fiducial Generalized Confidence Intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.