Cited by 260Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisTraffic and Road Safety

Testing for Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops From Behind a Veil of Darkness

Grogger, Jeffrey, Ridgeway, Greg·2006·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

The key problem in testing for racial profiling in traffic stops is estimating the risk set, or “benchmark,” against which to compare the race distribution of stopped drivers. To date, the two most common approaches have been to use residential population data or to conduct traffic surveys in which observers tally the race distribution of drivers at a certain location. It is widely recognized that residential population data provide poor estimates of the population at risk of a traffic stop; at the same time, traffic surveys have limitations and are more costly to carry out than the alternative that we propose herein. In this article we propose a test for racial profiling that does not require explicit, external estimates of the risk set. Rather, our approach makes use of what we call the “veil of darkness” hypothesis, which asserts that police are less likely to know the race of a motorist before making a stop after dark than they are during daylight. If we assume that racial differences in traffic patterns, driving behavior, and exposure to law enforcement do not vary between daylight and darkness, then we can test for racial profiling by comparing the race distribution of stops made during daylight to the race distribution of stops made after dark. We propose a means of weakening this assumption by restricting the sample to stops made during the evening hours and controlling for clock time while estimating daylight/darkness contrasts in the race distribution of stopped dri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/016214506000000168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The veil-of-darkness method described in Grogger and Ridgeway (2006) is used to assess racial bias in the decision to stop.

    “we use the veil-of-darkness method described in Grogger and Ridgeway (2006).”

    From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Grogger and Ridgeway, 2006

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 14 · Cited by 260

Authors
Grogger, J., & Ridgeway, G.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2006-09
Volume
101
Issue
475
Pages
878-887
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2081040435
Cited by
260
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
38.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
racial profiling, traffic stops, police stops, sensitivity analysis, Oakland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review