The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting at the Stateline Wind Energy Center: The Regime-Switching Space–Time Method
Abstract
With the global proliferation of wind power, the need for accurate short-term forecasts of wind resources at wind energy sites is becoming paramount. Regime-switching space–time (RST) models merge meteorological and statistical expertise to obtain accurate and calibrated, fully probabilistic forecasts of wind speed and wind power. The model formulation is parsimonious, yet takes into account all of the salient features of wind speed: alternating atmospheric regimes, temporal and spatial correlation, diurnal and seasonal nonstationarity, conditional heteroscedasticity, and non-Gaussianity. The RST method identifies forecast regimes at a wind energy site and fits a conditional predictive model for each regime. Geographically dispersed meteorological observations in the vicinity of the wind farm are used as off-site predictors. The RST technique was applied to 2-hour-ahead forecasts of hourly average wind speed near the Stateline wind energy center in the U. S. Pacific Northwest. The RST point forecasts and distributional forecasts were accurate, calibrated, and sharp, and they compared favorably with predictions based on state-of-the-art time series techniques. This suggests that quality meteorological data from sites upwind of wind farms can be efficiently used to improve short-term forecasts of wind resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Self-citationRegression, Prediction and Shrinkage
Copas, J. B. (1983) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01258.x · Cited by 612
Cited by
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Self-citationGneiting, T., & Katzfuss, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-062713-085831 · Cited by 888
Self-citationReview on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.033 · Cited by 646
Energy Forecasting: A Review and Outlook
Hong, T., Pinson, P., Wang, Y., Weron, R., Yang, D., & Zareipour, H. (2020) · IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy · doi:10.1109/oajpe.2020.3029979 · Cited by 621
From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short‐term wind power production
Pinson, P., Madsen, H., Nielsen, H. A., Papaefthymiou, G., & Klöckl, B. (2009) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.284 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Gneiting, T., Larson, K., Westrick, K., Genton, M. G., & Aldrich, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 475
- Pages
- 968-979
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2086284119
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting at the Stateline Wind Energy Center: The Regime-Switching Space–Time Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214506000000456
- The paper
- Gneiting, T., Larson, K., Westrick, K., Genton, M. G., & Aldrich, E. (2006). Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting at the Stateline Wind Energy Center: The Regime-Switching Space–Time Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.