Cited by 612Statistical Methods and InferenceAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and Applications

Regression, Prediction and Shrinkage

Copas, J. B.·1983·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary The fit of a regression predictor to new data is nearly always worse than its fit to the original data. Anticipating this shrinkage leads to Stein-type predictors which, under certain assumptions, give a uniformly lower prediction mean squared error than least squares. Shrinkage can be particularly marked when stepwise fitting is used: the shrinkage is then closer to that expected of the full regression rather than of the subset regression actually fitted. Preshrunk predictors for selected subsets are proposed and tested on a number of practical examples. Both multiple and binary (logistic) regression models are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01258.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Almost 30 years of empirical Bayes research show that modeling approaches that shrink a coefficient part of the way back to zero can dominate all-or-nothing methods.

    “by now we have almost 30 years of good empirical Bayes research (e.g., Sclove, Morris, Radhakrishna, 1972; Copas, 1983) to show that modeling approaches that shrink a given coefficient part of the way back to zero can dominate all-or-nothing methods.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Copas, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Copas, J. B.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1983-07-01
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
311-335
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W48332454
Cited by
612
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
shrinkage, mean squared prediction error, stepwise regression, multiple linear regression, logistic regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review