The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covariance Tapering for Likelihood-Based Estimation in Large Spatial Data Sets
Open accessAbstract
Maximum likelihood is an attractive method of estimating covariance parameters in spatial models based on Gaussian processes. But calculating the likelihood can be computationally infeasible for large data sets, requiring O(n3) calculations for a data set with n observations. This article proposes the method of covariance tapering to approximate the likelihood in this setting. In this approach, covariance matrixes are “tapered,” or multiplied element wise by a sparse correlation matrix. The resulting matrixes can then be manipulated using efficient sparse matrix algorithms. We propose two approximations to the Gaussian likelihood using tapering. One of these approximations simply replaces the model covariance with a tapered version, whereas the other is motivated by the theory of unbiased estimating equations. Focusing on the particular case of the Matérn class of covariance functions, we give conditions under which estimators maximizing the tapering approximations are, like the maximum likelihood estimator, strongly consistent. Moreover, we show in a simulation study that the tapering estimators can have sampling densities quite similar to that of the maximum likelihood estimator, even when the degree of tapering is severe. We illustrate the accuracy and computational gains of the tapering methods in an analysis of yearly total precipitation anomalies at weather stations in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Cited by
Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Mincheva, M. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12016 · Cited by 909
Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets
Datta, A., Banerjee, S., Finley, A. O., & Gelfand, A. E. (2016) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1044091 · Cited by 615
de la Torre, S., Jullo, E., Giocoli, C., Pezzotta, A., Bel, J., Granett, B. R., Guzzo, L., Garilli, B., Scodeggio, M., Bolzonella, M., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630276 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufman, C. G., Schervish, M. J., & Nychka, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 484
- Pages
- 1545-1555
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2013627498
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covariance Tapering for Likelihood-Based Estimation in Large Spatial Data Sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/016214508000000959
- The paper
- Kaufman, C. G., Schervish, M. J., & Nychka, D. W. (2008). Covariance Tapering for Likelihood-Based Estimation in Large Spatial Data Sets. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.