The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets
Open accessAbstract
Spatial process models for analyzing geostatistical data entail computations that become prohibitive as the number of spatial locations become large. This article develops a class of highly scalable nearest-neighbor Gaussian process (NNGP) models to provide fully model-based inference for large geostatistical datasets. We establish that the NNGP is a well-defined spatial process providing legitimate finite-dimensional Gaussian densities with sparse precision matrices. We embed the NNGP as a sparsity-inducing prior within a rich hierarchical modeling framework and outline how computationally efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms can be executed without storing or decomposing large matrices. The floating point operations (flops) per iteration of this algorithm is linear in the number of spatial locations, thereby rendering substantial scalability. We illustrate the computational and inferential benefits of the NNGP over competing methods using simulation studies and also analyze forest biomass from a massive U.S. Forest Inventory dataset at a scale that precludes alternative dimension-reducing methods. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of Statistical Software
Leeuw, J. D. (2009) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.10 · Cited by 3,599
(2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/(issn)1944-8007 · Cited by 3,049
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data
Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., & Gelfand, A. E. (2014) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17115 · Cited by 2,500
Self-citationStein, M. L. (1999) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6 · Cited by 2,348
Diggle, P. J., Tawn, J. A., & Moyeed, R. A. (1998) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00113 · Cited by 2,174
Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging
Rathbun, S. L., & Stein, M. L. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669494 · Cited by 1,916
Rue, H., & Held, L. (2005) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203492024 · Cited by 1,823
Statistics for Spatio‐Temporal Data
Subba Rao, T. (2012) · Journal of Time Series Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00765.x · Cited by 1,560
Direct Methods for Sparse Linear Systems
Davis, T. A. (2006) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718881 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
Valid Model-Free Spatial Prediction
Mao, H., Martin, R., & Reich, B. J. (2024) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2022.2147531 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Datta, A., Banerjee, S., Finley, A. O., & Gelfand, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-04-02
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 514
- Pages
- 800-812
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1898904249
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 27.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.2015.1044091
- The paper
- Datta, A., Banerjee, S., Finley, A. O., & Gelfand, A. E. (2016). Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1044091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.