The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementations of the Monte Carlo EM Algorithm
Abstract
The Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm is a modification of the EM algorithm where the expectation in the E-step is computed numerically through Monte Carlo simulations. The most exible and generally applicable approach to obtaining a Monte Carlo sample in each iteration of an MCEM algorithm is through Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) routines such as the Gibbs and Metropolis–Hastings samplers. Although MCMC estimation presents a tractable solution to problems where the E-step is not available in closed form, two issues arise when implementing this MCEM routine: (1) how do we minimize the computational cost in obtaining an MCMC sample? and (2) how do we choose the Monte Carlo sample size? We address the first question through an application of importance sampling whereby samples drawn during previous EM iterations are recycled rather than running an MCMC sampler each MCEM iteration. The second question is addressed through an application of regenerative simulation. We obtain approximate independent and identical samples by subsampling the generated MCMC sample during different renewal periods. Standard central limit theorems may thus be used to gauge Monte Carlo error. In particular, we apply an automated rule for increasing the Monte Carlo sample size when the Monte Carlo error overwhelms the EM estimate at any given iteration. We illustrate our MCEM algorithm through analyses of two datasets fit by generalized linear mixed models. As a part of these applications, we demonstrate the improvement in computational cost and efficiency of our routine over alternative MCEM strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Cited by
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451
Inferring High-Level Behavior from Low-Level Sensors
Patterson, D. J., Liao, L., Fox, D., & Kautz, H. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39653-6_6 · Cited by 517
Simultaneous Tracking and Activity Recognition (STAR) Using Many Anonymous, Binary Sensors
Wilson, D. H., & Atkeson, C. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11428572_5 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, R. A., & Casella, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 422-439
- ISSN
- 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2715
- OpenAlex
- W2047834101
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementations of the Monte Carlo EM Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/106186001317115045
- The paper
- Levine, R. A., & Casella, G. (2001). Implementations of the Monte Carlo EM Algorithm. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186001317115045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.