The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution
Abstract
Linear mixed-effects models are frequently used to analyze repeated measures data, because they model flexibly the within-subject correlation often present in this type of data. The most popular linear mixed-effects model for a continuous response assumes normal distributions for the random effects and the within-subject errors, making it sensitive to outliers. Such outliers are more problematic for mixed-effects models than for fixed-effects models, because they may occur in the random effects, in the within-subject errors, or in both, making them harder to be detected in practice. Motivated by a real dataset from an orthodontic study, we propose a robust hierarchical linear mixed-effects model in which the random effects and the within-subject errors have multivariate t-distributions, with known or unknown degrees-of-freedom, which are allowed to vary with groups of subjects. By using a gamma-normal hierarchical structure, our model allows the identification and classification of both types of outliers, comparing favorably to other multivariate t models for robust estimation in mixed-effects models previously described in the literature, which use only the marginal distribution of the responses. Allowing for unknown degrees-of-freedom, which are estimated from the data, our model provides a balance between robustness and efficiency, leading to reliable results for valid inference. We describe and compare efficient EM-type algorithms, including ECM, ECME, and PX-EM, for maximum likelihood estimation in the robust multivariate t model. We compare the performance of the Gaussian and the multivariatet models under different patterns of outliers. Simulation results indicate that the multivariate t substantially outperforms the Gaussian model when outliers are present in the data, even in moderate amounts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,186
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Self-citationRandom-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications
Bates, D. M., & Watts, D. G. (1988) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316757 · Cited by 3,979
Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions
Ruppert, D. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269782 · Cited by 3,880
On the Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm
Wu, C. F. J. (1983) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346060 · Cited by 3,269
Barnett, V., Lewis, T., & Abeles, F. (1979) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2995737 · Cited by 2,824
Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework
MENG, X.-L., & RUBIN, D. B. (1993) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/80.2.267 · Cited by 1,861
Cited by
Trimmed constrained mixed effects models: formulations and algorithms
Zheng, P., Barber, R., Sorensen, R. J. D., Murray, C. J. L., & Aravkin, A. Y. (2021) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2020.1868303 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinheiro, J. C., Liu, C., & Wu, Y. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-276
- ISSN
- 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2715
- OpenAlex
- W2078055172
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/10618600152628059
- The paper
- Pinheiro, J. C., Liu, C., & Wu, Y. N. (2001). Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1198/10618600152628059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.