Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution

Pinheiro, José C, Liu, Chuanhai, Wu, Ying Nian·2001·Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

Abstract

Linear mixed-effects models are frequently used to analyze repeated measures data, because they model flexibly the within-subject correlation often present in this type of data. The most popular linear mixed-effects model for a continuous response assumes normal distributions for the random effects and the within-subject errors, making it sensitive to outliers. Such outliers are more problematic for mixed-effects models than for fixed-effects models, because they may occur in the random effects, in the within-subject errors, or in both, making them harder to be detected in practice. Motivated by a real dataset from an orthodontic study, we propose a robust hierarchical linear mixed-effects model in which the random effects and the within-subject errors have multivariate t-distributions, with known or unknown degrees-of-freedom, which are allowed to vary with groups of subjects. By using a gamma-normal hierarchical structure, our model allows the identification and classification of both types of outliers, comparing favorably to other multivariate t models for robust estimation in mixed-effects models previously described in the literature, which use only the marginal distribution of the responses. Allowing for unknown degrees-of-freedom, which are estimated from the data, our model provides a balance between robustness and efficiency, leading to reliable results for valid inference. We describe and compare efficient EM-type algorithms, including ECM, ECME, and PX-EM, for maximum likelihood estimation in the robust multivariate t model. We compare the performance of the Gaussian and the multivariatet models under different patterns of outliers. Simulation results indicate that the multivariate t substantially outperforms the Gaussian model when outliers are present in the data, even in moderate amounts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/10618600152628059

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Pinheiro, J. C., Liu, C., & Wu, Y. N.
Venue
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Published
2001-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
249-276
ISSN
  • 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2715
OpenAlex
W2078055172
Cited by
287
References
32
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/10618600152628059
The paper
Pinheiro, J. C., Liu, C., & Wu, Y. N. (2001). Efficient Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using the Multivariate t Distribution. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1198/10618600152628059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.