Cited by 3Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Leveraging Digital Technology to Enhance Mind-Body Approaches in Cancer Treatment

Heudel, Pierre, Ubelmann, Céline·2025·JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer treatment involves significant psychological and emotional challenges. Conventional therapies often diminish quality of life, exacerbating stress, anxiety, and depression. Mind-body practices, such as sophrology, offer complementary solutions to improve well-being. Digital technology has expanded access to these practices, providing personalized tools to manage stress and emotional health remotely. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review examines digital applications in cancer care, focusing on sophrology and other mind-body techniques. Studies evaluating the efficacy of digital platforms and artificial intelligence–driven interventions for stress management, fatigue reduction, and psychological support are analyzed, highlighting their impact on patient outcomes. RESULTS: Digital platforms integrating sophrology significantly alleviate cancer-related side effects. The ePAL app reduced pain scores by 30% over 8 weeks, and StressProffen improved fatigue scores by 20% and adherence to stress management (75% v 50% in controls). The PINK! app increased physical activity by 35% and reduced psychological distress by 30% over 12 weeks. During the COVID-19 pandemic, internet-based mindfulness programs reduced anxiety by 18% and depression by 22%. These tools enhance autonomy and promote community support through virtual sessions, reducing isolation. CONCLUSION: Digital technology complements traditional cancer treatments, improving patient access, personalization, and adherence. Challenges such as digital literacy, data privacy, and regulatory oversight must be addressed. These tools provide holistic support and foster resilience, enhancing the cancer care continuum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/cci-24-00293

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heudel, P., & Ubelmann, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Léon Bérard (FR)
  • Body-Mind Psychotherapist, Lyon, France
Venue
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Published
2025-03
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e2400293-e2400293
ISSN
2473-4276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408781103
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mind-body interventions, sophrology, digital health applications, cancer patients, stress management, fatigue, psychological distress, artificial intelligence interventions, COVID-19 pandemic, digital literacy, data privacy, patient autonomy, quality of life
MeSH terms
Digital Technology, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Telemedicine, Mind-Body Therapies, Mobile Applications, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review