Cited by 103Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The Cancer Survivorship Journey: Models of Care, Disparities, Barriers, and Future Directions

Open access
Halpern, Michael T., McCabe, Mary S., Burg, Mary Ann·2016·American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book

Abstract

Although the number of long-term cancer survivors has increased substantially over past years, the journey of survivorship does not always include high-quality, patient-centered care. A variety of survivorship care models have evolved based on who provides this care, the survivor population, the site of care, and/or the capacity for delivering specific services. Other areas of survivorship care being explored include how long follow-up care is needed, application of a risk-based approach to survivorship care, and the role of the survivor in his or her own recovery. However, there is little evidence indicating whether any models improve clinical or patient-reported outcomes. A newer focus in survivorship care has included assessment of potential disparities; the sociodemographic characteristics of population subgroups associated with barriers to receiving high-quality cancer treatment may also affect the survivorship period. Developing policies and programs to address disparities in survivorship care is not simple, and examining how financial hardship affects cancer outcomes, reducing economic barriers to care, and increasing incorporation of patient-centered strategies may be important components. Here too, there is little evidence regarding the best strategies to address these disparities. Barriers to providing high-quality, patient-centered survivorship care include lack of evidence, lack of a trained survivorship workforce, lack of reimbursement structures/insurance coverage, and lack of a health care system that reduces fragmented care. Future research needs to focus on developing a survivorship care evidence base, exploring strategies to facilitate provision of survivorship care, and disseminating best survivorship care practices to diverse and international audiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/edbk_156039

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern, M. T., McCabe, M. S., & Burg, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book
Published
2016-05
Volume
36
Issue
36
Pages
231-239
ISSN
  • 1548-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8756
OpenAlex
W4254463786
Cited by
103
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Partenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cancer survivorship, survivorship care models, health disparities, barriers to care, patient-centered care, financial hardship, insurance coverage, reimbursement structures, care fragmentation, sociodemographic disparities
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review