The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Abstract
Systematic capture of the patient perspective can inform the development of new cancer therapies. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly included in cancer clinical trials; however, there is heterogeneity in the constructs, measures, and analytic approaches that have been used making these endpoints challenging to interpret. There is renewed effort to identify rigorous methods to obtain high-quality and informative PRO data from cancer clinical trials. In this setting, PROs are used to address specific research objectives, and an important objective that spans the product development life cycle is the assessment of safety and tolerability. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP) has identified symptomatic adverse events (AEs) as a central PRO concept, and a systematic assessment of patient-reported symptomatic AEs can provide data to complement clinician reporting. The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is being evaluated by multiple stakeholders, including the FDA, and is considered a promising tool to provide a standard yet flexible method to assess symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective. In this article, we briefly review the FDA OHOP’s perspective on PROs in cancer trials submitted to the FDA and focus on the assessment of symptomatic AEs using PRO-CTCAE. We conclude by discussing further work that must be done to broaden the use of PRO-CTCAE as a method to provide patient-centered data that can complement existing safety and tolerability assessments across cancer clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review
Michot, J. M., Bigenwald, C., Champiat, S., Collins, M., Carbonnel, F., Postel-Vinay, S., Berdelou, A., Varga, A., Bahleda, R., Hollebecque, A., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016 · Cited by 2,127
Basch, E., Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., Clauser, S. B., Minasian, L. M., Dueck, A. C., Mendoza, T. R., Hay, J., Atkinson, T. M., Abernethy, A. P., et al. (2014) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju244 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationDueck, A. C., Mendoza, T. R., Mitchell, S. A., Reeve, B. B., Castro, K. M., Rogak, L. J., Atkinson, T. M., Bennett, A. V., Denicoff, A. M., O'Mara, A. M., et al. (2015) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639 · Cited by 1,030
Self-citationBasch, E., Iasonos, A., McDonough, T., Barz, A., Culkin, A., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., & Schrag, D. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70910-x · Cited by 653
Self-citationPerformance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study
Sørensen, J., Klee, M., Palshof, T., & Hansen, H. (1993) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1993.140 · Cited by 483
Kluetz, P. G., Slagle, A., Papadopoulos, E. J., Johnson, L. L., Donoghue, M., Kwitkowski, V. E., Chen, W.-H., Sridhara, R., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2035 · Cited by 334
Self-citationPatient-centric trials for therapeutic development in precision oncology
Biankin, A. V., Piantadosi, S., & Hollingsworth, S. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15819 · Cited by 282
Comparison Between Patient-Reported and Clinician-Observed Symptoms in Oncology
Xiao, C., Polomano, R., & Bruner, D. W. (2013) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0b013e318269040f · Cited by 191
A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire
Niezgoda, H. E., & Pater, J. L. (1993) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00449426 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Lheureux, S., Gourley, C., Vergote, I., & Oza, A. M. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32552-2 · Cited by 1,919
Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Slade, A., Chan, A.-W., King, M. T., and the SPIRIT-PRO Group, Hunn, A., Bottomley, A., Regnault, A., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21903 · Cited by 814
Self-citationGreenlee, H., DuPont‐Reyes, M. J., Balneaves, L. G., Carlson, L. E., Cohen, M. R., Deng, G., Johnson, J. A., Mumber, M., Seely, D., Zick, S. M., et al. (2017) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21397 · Cited by 768
Beaver, J. A., Howie, L. J., Pelosof, L., Kim, T., Liu, J., Goldberg, K. B., Sridhara, R., Blumenthal, G. M., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5618 · Cited by 298
Self-citationA biopsychosocial model of chronic pain for older adults
Miaskowski, C., Blyth, F., Nicosia, F., Haan, M., Keefe, F., Smith, A., & Ritchie, C. (2020) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnz329 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluetz, P. G., Chingos, D. T., Basch, E. M., & Mitchell, S. A.
- Venue
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 1548-8748 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8756
- OpenAlex
- W2413971556
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/edbk_159514
- The paper
- Kluetz, P. G., Chingos, D. T., Basch, E. M., & Mitchell, S. A. (2016). Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_159514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
