Palliative care for family caregivers
Abstract
Family caregivers provide substantial care for patients with advanced cancer, while suffering from hidden morbidity and unmet needs. The objectives of this review were to examine risk factors associated with caregiving for patients with advanced cancer, evaluate the evidence for pertinent interventions, and provide a practical framework for palliative care of caregivers in oncology settings. We reviewed studies examining the association of factors at the level of the caregiver, patient, caregiver-patient relationship, and caregiving itself, with adverse outcomes. In addition, we reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions targeting the caregiver, the caregiver-patient dyad, or the patient and their family. Risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes included those related to the patient's declining status, symptom distress, and poor prognostic understanding; risk factors for adverse bereavement outcomes included unfavorable circumstances of the patient's death. Among the 16 randomized trials, the most promising results showed improvement of depression resulting from early palliative care interventions; results for quality of life were generally nonsignificant or showed an effect only on some subscales. Caregiving outcomes included burden, appraisal, and competence, among others, and showed mixed findings. Only three trials measured bereavement outcomes, with mostly nonsignificant results. On the basis of existent literature and our clinical experience, we propo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.
“Although family support is deeply ingrained in palliative care philosophy,9 real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.10”
From Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Interventions recommended include assessing the caregiver's situation and needs, such as referring to appropriate services and resources, which is critical for wellbeing of caregiver.
“Interventions recommended include assessing the caregiver's situation and needs such as referring to appropriate services and resources which is critical for wellbeing of caregiver [12].”
From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 292
- Authors
- Alam, S., Hannon, B., & Zimmermann, C.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2020-03-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 926-936
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W3005460027
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- family caregivers, palliative care, advanced cancer, caregiver burden, caregiver depression, caregiver quality of life, bereavement, caregiver-patient relationship, risk factors, caregiver interventions, symptom distress, prognosis understanding
- MeSH terms
- Bereavement, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review