The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy.
Abstract
In a study of 1,010 patients with solitary, unilateral, nonmetastatic breast cancer, the histologic grade, assessed by a multifactorial analysis (Cox model) to study its significance with other prognostic factors, was found to be an important, independent factor. For 612 operable patients, two laboratory characteristics, the number of histologically positive nodes and the histologic grade, were the most valuable predictors. These two factors alone form a predictive index that may be an excellent and simple guide for the clinical decision of subsequent therapy. For 398 patients with inoperable breast cancer (ie, tumor greater than or equal to 7 cm, N2-3, inflammatory, skin fixation, and clinically rapidly growing forms), the histologic grade (performed on drill or cutting needle biopsy) was again a most important (and with inflammatory forms the most important) predictor of prognosis in these patients. Our data support that performing our modified histoprognostic grading of Scarff and Bloom is simple, reproducible, incurs no additional cost, may be carried out in the simplest histology laboratory, and finally, defines an important risk factor in all patients. It should be routine for all breast cancer specimens. Furthermore, studies of adjuvant therapy should stratify patients for this variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arriagada, R., Lê, M. G., Rochard, F., & Contesso, G. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.5.1558 · Cited by 612
Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women
Chung, M., Chang, H. R., Bland, K. I., & Wanebo, H. J. (1996) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<97::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 382
Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J. (2008) · 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2008.4541041 · Cited by 276
Arriagada, R., Lê, M. G., Guinebretière, J.-M., Dunant, A., Rochard, F., & Tursz, T. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg452 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Contesso, G., Mouriesse, H., Friedman, S., Genin, J., Sarrazin, D., & Rouesse, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1378-1386
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1851002272
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1987.5.9.1378
- The paper
- Contesso, G., Mouriesse, H., Friedman, S., Genin, J., Sarrazin, D., & Rouesse, J. (1987). The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1987.5.9.1378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.