The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term survival and the probability of "cure" in a group of 644 patients treated by mastectomy for T1 breast carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 18.2 years, 23% were dead of recurrent breast carcinoma, 3% were alive with recurrent disease, and 74% had not experienced a recurrence. The probability of recurrence was directly related to the initial extent of the disease. Overall, 16% of recurrences and 25% of deaths due to disease occurred in the second decade of follow-up. The proportion of recurrences detected in the second decade was inversely related to the stage of the primary tumor at diagnosis. When stratified by tumor size, T1N0M0 patients with tumors 1.0 cm or less in diameter had a significantly better 20-year recurrence-free survival (86%) than did T1N0M0 patients with tumors 1.1 to 2.0 cm (69%). When observed and expected survival curves were compared by the method of Brinkley and Haybittle, it appeared that 80% of T1N0M0 patients with tumors 1 cm or less might be cured at 20 years, whereas for those in the 1.1- to 2-cm group, the proportion cured was indeterminate, but might be as high as 70%. A potentially cured group could not be identified among T1N1M0 patients, but an estimated 52% of these patients did not have a recurrence within the nearly 20-year follow-up period. These data are important when one considers the proper role of adjuvant therapy for stage I disease. Patients with tumors larger than 1 cm and those with axillary lymph node metastases may have an improved recurrence-free survival as a result of systemic adjuvant treatment, while women in the T1N0M0 group with an especially favorable recurrence-free survival, particularly those with tumors 1 cm in diameter or smaller, might be spared adjuvant therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy.
Saphner, T., Tormey, D. C., & Gray, R. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2738 · Cited by 830
Prognostic Factors and Treatment Decisions in Axillary-Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Desforges, J. F., McGuire, W. L., & Clark, G. M. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199206253262607 · Cited by 282
Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Decisions in Axillary Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Elledge, R. M., & McGuire, W. L. (1993) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.001221 · Cited by 257
Characterization of RhoC Expression in Benign and Malignant Breast Disease
Kleer, C. G., van Golen, K. L., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z.-F., Rubin, M. A., & Merajver, S. D. (2002) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64877-8 · Cited by 157
Changes in breast cancer therapy because of pathology second opinions
Staradub, V. L., Messenger, K. A., Hao, N., Wiely, E. L., & Morrow, M. (2002) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf02574516 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, P. R., Groshen, S., Saigo, P. E., Kinne, D. W., & Hellman, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-366
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2227545672
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1989.7.3.355
- The paper
- Rosen, P. R., Groshen, S., Saigo, P. E., Kinne, D. W., & Hellman, S. (1989). A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.3.355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.