The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response.
Abstract
Thirty-seven men with symptomatic bone metastases from prostate cancer that had progressed following earlier treatment with estrogens and/or orchidectomy were treated with low-dose prednisone (7.5 to 10 mg daily). The rationale for this treatment was that some patients might still have hormone-sensitive disease that was stimulated by weak androgens of adrenal origin, and that these androgens could be suppressed by prednisone through its negative feedback on secretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). Response to treatment was assessed by requirement for analgesics, by the McGill-Melzack pain questionnaire, and by a series of 17 linear analog self-assessment (LASA) scales relating to pain and to various aspects of quality of life. Fourteen patients (38%) had improvement in indices used to assess pain at 1 month after starting prednisone, and seven patients (19%) maintained this improvement for 3 to 30 months (median, 4 months). Reduction in pain was associated with improvement in other dimensions of quality of life, and in the scale for overall well-being. Prednisone treatment led to a decrease in the concentration of serum testosterone in seven of nine patients where it was not initially suppressed below 2 nmol/L, and caused a decrease in serum levels of androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in more than 50% of patients. Symptomatic response was associated with a decrease in serum concentration of adrenal androgens. We conclude that (1) low-dose prednisone may cause useful relief of pain in some patients with advanced prostatic cancer; (2) relief of pain was associated with suppression of adrenal androgens; and (3) measures of pain and quality of life can be used to assess possible benefits of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Tannock, I. F., de Wit, R., Berry, W. R., Horti, J., Pluzanska, A., Chi, K. N., Oudard, S., Théodore, C., James, N. D., Turesson, I., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040720 · Cited by 5,735
Self-citationEmerging mechanisms of resistance to androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate cancer
Watson, P. A., Arora, V. K., & Sawyers, C. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc4016 · Cited by 1,536
Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer
Litwin, M. S., Hays, R. D., Fink, A., Ganz, P. A., Leake, B., Leach, G. E., & Brook, R. H. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520260051032 · Cited by 1,020
Esper, P., Mo, F., Chodak, G., Sinner, M., Cella, D., & Pienta, K. J. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00459-7 · Cited by 696
Prostate cancer and health‐related quality of life: a review of the literature
Eton, D. T., & Lepore, S. J. (2002) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.572 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Tannock, I., Gospodarowicz, M., Meakin, W., Panzarella, T., Stewart, L., & Rider, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 590-597
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1797512951
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1989.7.5.590
- The paper
- Tannock, I., Gospodarowicz, M., Meakin, W., Panzarella, T., Stewart, L., & Rider, W. (1989). Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.5.590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.