The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodal therapy for the management of primary, nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone: a long-term follow-up of the First Intergroup study.
Abstract
A total of 342 previously untreated eligible children were entered into the first Intergroup Ewing's Sarcoma Study (IESS) between May 1973 and November 1978. In group I institutions, patients were randomized between treatment 1 (radiotherapy to primary lesion plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dactinomycin, and Adriamycin [doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH] [VAC plus ADR]) or treatment 2 (same as treatment 1 without ADR), and group II institutions randomized patients between treatment 2 or treatment 3 (same as treatment 2 plus bilateral pulmonary radiotherapy [VAC plus BPR]). The percentages of patients relapse-free and surviving (RFS) at 5 years for treatments 1, 2, and 3 were 60%, 24%, and 44%, respectively. There was strong statistical evidence of a significant advantage in RFS for treatment 1 (VAC plus ADR) versus 2 (VAC alone) (P less than .001) and 3 (P less than .05) and also of treatment 3 versus 2 (P less than .001). Similar significant results were observed with respect to overall survival. Patients with disease at pelvic sites have significantly poorer survival at 5 years than those with disease at nonpelvic sites (34% v 57%; P less than .001). Among pelvic cases, there was no evidence of differing survival by treatment (P = .81), but among nonpelvic cases, there was strong evidence of differing survival by treatment (P less than .001). The overall percentage of patients developing metastatic disease was 44%; the percentages by treatments 1, 2, and 3 were 30%, 72%, and 42%, respectively. The overall incidence of local recurrence was 15%, and there was no evidence that local recurrence rate differed by treatment. Patient characteristics related to prognosis, both with respect to RFS and overall survival experience, were primary site (nonpelvic patients were most favorable) and patient age (younger patients were more favorable).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Balamuth, N. J., & Womer, R. B. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70286-4 · Cited by 686
Casali, P. G., Bielack, S., Abecassis, N., Aro, H. T., Bauer, S., Biagini, R., Bonvalot, S., Boukovinas, I., Bovee, J. V. M. G., Brennan, B., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy310 · Cited by 617
Common Musculoskeletal Tumors of Childhood and Adolescence
Arndt, C. A. S., & Crist, W. M. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907293410507 · Cited by 657
Grier, H. E. (1997) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70541-1 · Cited by 321
The clinical pharmacology and use of antimicrotubule agents in cancer chemotherapeutics
Rowinsky, E. K., & Donehower, R. C. (1991) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(91)90086-2 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Nesbit, M. E., Gehan, E. A., Burgert, E. O., Vietti, T. J., Cangir, A., Tefft, M., Evans, R., Thomas, P., Askin, F. B., & Kissane, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1664-1674
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1797236870
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodal therapy for the management of primary, nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone: a long-term follow-up of the First Intergroup study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1990.8.10.1664
- The paper
- Nesbit, M. E., Gehan, E. A., Burgert, E. O., Vietti, T. J., Cangir, A., Tefft, M., Evans, R., Thomas, P., Askin, F. B., & Kissane, J. M. (1990). Multimodal therapy for the management of primary, nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone: a long-term follow-up of the First Intergroup study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1990.8.10.1664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.