The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of compliance with treatment on survival among patients with hematologic malignancies.
Abstract
Ninety-four newly diagnosed patients with hematologic malignancies were monitored for compliance with oral medication and scheduled clinic appointments over a 6-month treatment period. They were assigned at entry either to a control condition or an intervention condition designed to improve compliance. Compliance with medication was assessed objectively with serial serum drug and metabolite levels, as well as with self-report indices obtained on a monthly basis. Medical records were abstracted to obtain data on the number of appointments kept, treatment given, disease characteristics, and survival. On univariate analyses using the log-rank test, five variables were found to be significantly related to survival. These included compliance with allopurinol (probably acting as a surrogate for self-medication with other chemotherapeutic agents) (P = .007), control versus educational program cohort (P less than .001), disease severity (P = .009), Karnofsky at diagnosis (P = .011), sex (P = .084), and clinic appointments kept (P = .043). In hierarchical proportional hazards models, the following variables were associated with decreased risk of death: disease severity (P less than .025), keeping over 60% of appointments (P less than .05), allopurinol/oxipurinol compliance (P less than .01), and educational program cohort (P less than .05). After controlling for all other variables, three variables were associated with increased survival: high disease severity (relative risk [RR] = 2.48), high compliance with allopurinol (RR = .45), and educational program cohort (RR = .39). We conclude that compliance with oral medication has a significant effect on patient survival. In addition, the use of special educational and supportive programs designed to improve patient compliance are associated with significant prolongation of patient survival due to, as well as independent of their effects on compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protective and Damaging Effects of Stress Mediators
McEwen, B. S. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801153380307 · Cited by 6,733
Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Robin DiMatteo, M., Giordani, P. J., Lepper, H. S., & Croghan, T. W. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009 · Cited by 1,490
Mood disorders in the medically ill: scientific review and recommendations
Evans, D. L., Charney, D. S., Lewis, L., Golden, R. N., Gorman, J. M., Krishnan, K. R. R., Nemeroff, C. B., Bremner, J. D., Carney, R. M., Coyne, J. C., et al. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.001 · Cited by 1,071
Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression
Spiegel, D., & Giese-Davis, J. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00566-3 · Cited by 874
Kato, P. M., Cole, S. W., Bradlyn, A. S., & Pollock, B. H. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3134 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, J. L., Shelton, D. R., Krailo, M., & Levine, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 356-364
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2178871496
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of compliance with treatment on survival among patients with hematologic malignancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1990.8.2.356
- The paper
- Richardson, J. L., Shelton, D. R., Krailo, M., & Levine, A. M. (1990). The effect of compliance with treatment on survival among patients with hematologic malignancies. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1990.8.2.356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.