The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodal therapy for the management of nonpelvic, localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone: intergroup study IESS-II.
Abstract
Two hundred fourteen eligible patients with previously untreated, localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone were randomized on IESS-II to receive Adriamycin (ADR; doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin by either a high-dose intermittent method (treatment [trt] 1) or a moderate-dose continuous method (trt 2) similar to the four-drug arm of IESS-I. Patient characteristics (sex, primary site, type of surgery) were stratified at the time of registration; these and other patient characteristics (age, time from symptoms to diagnosis, race) were distributed similarly between treatments. Surgical resection was encouraged, but not mandatory. Local radiation therapy was the same as for IESS-I. The median follow-up time is 5.6 years. The overall outcome was significantly better on trt 1 than on trt 2. At 5 years, the estimated percentages of patients who were disease-free, relapse-free, and surviving were 68%, 73%, and 77% for trt 1 and 48%, 56%, and 63% for trt 2 (P = .02, .03, and .05, respectively). The major reason for treatment failure for both treatment groups was the development of metastatic disease. The lung was the most common site of metastases followed by bone sites. The combined incidence of severe or worse toxicity (67%) was comparable between the treatments; however, severe or worse cardiovascular toxicity was significantly greater on trt 1. Tne only treatment-associated deaths (N = 3) were on trt 1 and were cardiac-related.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Womer, R. B., West, D. C., Krailo, M. D., Dickman, P. S., Pawel, B. R., Grier, H. E., Marcus, K., Sailer, S., Healey, J. H., Dormans, J. P., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.41.5703 · Cited by 757
Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration
Gaspar, N., Hawkins, D. S., Dirksen, U., Lewis, I. J., Ferrari, S., Le Deley, M.-C., Kovar, H., Grimer, R., Whelan, J., Claude, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.5256 · Cited by 722
Balamuth, N. J., & Womer, R. B. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70286-4 · Cited by 686
Common Musculoskeletal Tumors of Childhood and Adolescence
Arndt, C. A. S., & Crist, W. M. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907293410507 · Cited by 657
Grier, H. E. (1997) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70541-1 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgert, E. O., Nesbit, M. E., Garnsey, L. A., Gehan, E. A., Herrmann, J., Vietti, T. J., Cangir, A., Tefft, M., Evans, R., & Thomas, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1514-1524
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1827235876
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodal therapy for the management of nonpelvic, localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone: intergroup study IESS-II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1990.8.9.1514
- The paper
- Burgert, E. O., Nesbit, M. E., Garnsey, L. A., Gehan, E. A., Herrmann, J., Vietti, T. J., Cangir, A., Tefft, M., Evans, R., & Thomas, P. (1990). Multimodal therapy for the management of nonpelvic, localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone: intergroup study IESS-II. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1990.8.9.1514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.