The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serum sialyl Tn as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Monoclonal antibody (moAB) TKH-2 directed to the tumor-associated O-linked sialyl 2-6-alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminyl (sialyl Tn; STN) epitope was generated by immunization with ovine submaxillary mucin (Kjeldsen et al, Cancer Res 48:2214-2220, 1988). We investigated whether circulating serum levels of STN antigen might influence the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 126 healthy nonpregnant women, 157 patients with benign gynecologic disease, and 89 patients with histologically proven epithelial ovarian cancer. Circulating serum STN-antigen concentrations (U/mL) were determined by a competitive radioimmunoassay kit (Otsuka Assay Laboratories, Tokushima, Japan) in a one-step procedure. RESULTS: Serum antigen levels were elevated in 48.3% of the patients. The levels of STN antigen were significantly higher in the sera of patients with cancer when compared with levels in benign and healthy controls (P less than .05). The 5-year survival rate for patients with STN-negative (serum STN levels less than 50.0 U/mL) versus STN-positive (greater than or equal to 50 U/mL) tumors was 76.9% versus 10.8%, respectively (P less than .05). The progression-free interval (PFI) at 5 years was 51.9% versus 5.4%, respectively (P less than .05). The overall survival probability and PFI were worse in patients with STN-positive sera. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that stage, residual tumor size, positive STN, performance status, and histologic grade were the five important variables for predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a positive STN-antigen level in sera is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in ovarian cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer
Munkley, J., & Elliott, D. J. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8155 · Cited by 521
Hakomori, S.-I. (2001) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1267-7_24 · Cited by 448
Brossart, P., Heinrich, K. S., Stuhler, G., Behnke, L., Reichardt, V. L., Stevanovic, S., Muhm, A., Rammensee, H.-G., Kanz, L., & Brugger, W. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v93.12.4309 · Cited by 306
Miles, D., Roché, H., Martin, M., Perren, T. J., Cameron, D. A., Glaspy, J., Dodwell, D., Parker, J., Mayordomo, J., Tres, A., et al. (2011) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0307 · Cited by 262
Involvement of a Non-Human Sialic Acid in Human Cancer
Samraj, A. N., Läubli, H., Varki, N., & Varki, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2014.00033 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobayashi, H., Terao, T., & Kawashima, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1905156984
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum sialyl Tn as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.1.95
- The paper
- Kobayashi, H., Terao, T., & Kawashima, Y. (1992). Serum sialyl Tn as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.1.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.